Forums:Genealogy: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
(revert vandalism) |
m (Bot Message: signature to template) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::When we upgrade the wiki engine we'll have the ability to create fancier genealogies, we probably want to make sure the genealogies stay "editable" and are not static images, though I suppose it's not like the trees will change. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 19:49, 30 January 2007 (EST) | ::When we upgrade the wiki engine we'll have the ability to create fancier genealogies, we probably want to make sure the genealogies stay "editable" and are not static images, though I suppose it's not like the trees will change. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 19:49, 30 January 2007 (EST) | ||
:::Yeah, but what if someone feels more information could be included which hasn't. Or an error's been made, etc. etc. I think editable ones are better, but I agree they should be more pleasant to look at. — | :::Yeah, but what if someone feels more information could be included which hasn't. Or an error's been made, etc. etc. I think editable ones are better, but I agree they should be more pleasant to look at. — {{User:Mith/sig}} 07:27, 31 January 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 14:37, 1 September 2010
Tolkien Gateway > Council > Genealogy
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to change the genealogies to the graphic design that they have at Wikipedia. I personaly think that looks better than ASCII, but it might not be such a great idea because I don't want to delete peoples' hard work.
- You know, I have the ability to create genealogies in graphics. If that is what everyone wants. --Narfil Palùrfalas 18:28, 30 January 2007 (EST)
- When we upgrade the wiki engine we'll have the ability to create fancier genealogies, we probably want to make sure the genealogies stay "editable" and are not static images, though I suppose it's not like the trees will change. --Hyarion 19:49, 30 January 2007 (EST)