Forums:Genealogy: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
(revert vandalism)
m (Bot Message: signature to template)
Line 9: Line 9:
::When we upgrade the wiki engine we'll have the ability to create fancier genealogies, we probably want to make sure the genealogies stay "editable" and are not static images, though I suppose it's not like the trees will change. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 19:49, 30 January 2007 (EST)
::When we upgrade the wiki engine we'll have the ability to create fancier genealogies, we probably want to make sure the genealogies stay "editable" and are not static images, though I suppose it's not like the trees will change. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 19:49, 30 January 2007 (EST)


:::Yeah, but what if someone feels more information could be included which hasn't. Or an error's been made, etc. etc. I think editable ones are better, but I agree they should be more pleasant to look at. — [[User:Mith|Mith]] 07:27, 31 January 2007 (EST)
:::Yeah, but what if someone feels more information could be included which hasn't. Or an error's been made, etc. etc. I think editable ones are better, but I agree they should be more pleasant to look at. — {{User:Mith/sig}} 07:27, 31 January 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 14:37, 1 September 2010

Tolkien Gateway > Council > Genealogy


I was wondering if it would be a good idea to change the genealogies to the graphic design that they have at Wikipedia. I personaly think that looks better than ASCII, but it might not be such a great idea because I don't want to delete peoples' hard work.

You know, I have the ability to create genealogies in graphics. If that is what everyone wants. --Narfil Palùrfalas 18:28, 30 January 2007 (EST)
When we upgrade the wiki engine we'll have the ability to create fancier genealogies, we probably want to make sure the genealogies stay "editable" and are not static images, though I suppose it's not like the trees will change. --Hyarion 19:49, 30 January 2007 (EST)
Yeah, but what if someone feels more information could be included which hasn't. Or an error's been made, etc. etc. I think editable ones are better, but I agree they should be more pleasant to look at. — Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 07:27, 31 January 2007 (EST)