Forums:Infobox ideas: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary |
KingAragorn (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::2. I agree. | ::2. I agree. | ||
::3. Indeed, a generic character infobox would be useful.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 13:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | ::3. Indeed, a generic character infobox would be useful.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 13:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::Perhaps we could just have a generic character infobox for [[Celeborn]], [[Beorn]], [[Tom Bombadil]] and [[Goldberry]] etc.? Maybe Ents should have their own infobox?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 13:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:57, 9 August 2012
Tolkien Gateway > Forums > Infobox ideas
Just a few ideas for our infoboxes:
- Should we have generic Elf infobox for those Elves with a disputed origin (i.e. Celeborn)?
- Quite often we resort to putting the date of an Elf's departure into the West in the 'death' field. Should we have a "Sailed West" field for the Elven infoboxes (maybe even for Hobbits - Frodo, Bilbo, and Sam - and Dwarves - Gimli - too)?
- Should we have an "Enigmas" infobox for characters like Tom Bombadil and Goldberry?
Thoughts?-- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 13:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- 1. Yes.
- 2. Sure.
- 3. And something for Beorn and Ents too. --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 13:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- 1. I agree.
- 2. I agree.
- 3. Indeed, a generic character infobox would be useful.--Morgan 13:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps we could just have a generic character infobox for Celeborn, Beorn, Tom Bombadil and Goldberry etc.? Maybe Ents should have their own infobox?-- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 13:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
