Tolkien Gateway

Forum:Other writings

Revision as of 10:23, 13 November 2011 by Amroth (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Tolkien Gateway > Forums > Other writings

The section "Other writings" is a sort of standard on TG. Is it clear enough, or should it rather be "Other writings not of the legendarium" (or something similar)? (I'm thinking that a reader might not know what is meant in the first example by "other" - is it writings not mentioned in the article, or what?) --Morgan 20:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

I would be keen to avoid an unnecessarily long section title (I don't like "In other versions of the legendarium" as it is). I think we can grant the reader enough intelligence to read the text and understand. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 18:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Yes; we could always explain the use in a "Standards on TG"-page (perhaps it's already explained?). Then also renaming "Other versions of the legendarium" to "Other versions" is a good and logical conclusion.--Morgan 18:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
I think we should keep "Other versions of the legendarium"; it does the job and why should we change all instances of it for so little gain? Also, "Other writings" is fine. -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  14:44, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
+1 to KA. --Amroth 14:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
+1 KA. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 10:32, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
+1 KA. --Gamling, 20:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
+1 KA -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  22:25, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
+1. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 09:13, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Is that a +1 to KA, or a +1 to Morgan's -1? --Amroth 10:23, 13 November 2011 (UTC)