Letter 173 - Revision history

Mith: Changed date format

2011-06-11T10:42:24Z

Changed date format

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:42, 11 June 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\| #=173		\| #=173
	\| to=[[Katherine Farrer]]		\| to=[[Katherine Farrer]]
−	\| date=[[~~1955#~~October~~\|October 24~~]], [[1955]]	+	\| date=[[24 October]] [[1955]]
	\| subject=''[[The Return of the King]]'', publication		\| subject=''[[The Return of the King]]'', publication
	}}{{letter\|173}}		}}{{letter\|173}}

Mithbot: Bot: European Date Format - 21 October

2011-06-08T23:49:53Z

Bot: European Date Format - 21 October

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 8 June 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	}}{{letter\|173}}		}}{{letter\|173}}
	==Summary==		==Summary==
−	Tolkien told of the publishing of ''[[The Return of the King]]'' on [[20 October\|October 20]] and the O'Donnell lecture on [[October 21]]. Tolkien was well pleased with the reception, but did not think it would cause a new trend in literature.<ref>We can now safely say he did...</ref> He was pleased with the published ''The Return of the King'', but felt it incomplete if there was nothing on [[Samwise Gamgee\|Samwise]] and [[Elanor Gardner\|Elanor]].<ref>He was probably referring to ''[[The Epilogue]]'', as published in ''[[Sauron Defeated]]''. It was going to be included, but was considered too anti-climactic.</ref>	+	Tolkien told of the publishing of ''[[The Return of the King]]'' on [[20 October\|October 20]] and the O'Donnell lecture on [[21 October\|October 21]]. Tolkien was well pleased with the reception, but did not think it would cause a new trend in literature.<ref>We can now safely say he did...</ref> He was pleased with the published ''The Return of the King'', but felt it incomplete if there was nothing on [[Samwise Gamgee\|Samwise]] and [[Elanor Gardner\|Elanor]].<ref>He was probably referring to ''[[The Epilogue]]'', as published in ''[[Sauron Defeated]]''. It was going to be included, but was considered too anti-climactic.</ref>

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	<references/>		<references/>
	{{letters}}		{{letters}}

Mithbot: Bot: European Date Format - 20 October

2011-06-08T23:46:12Z

Bot: European Date Format - 20 October

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 8 June 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	}}{{letter\|173}}		}}{{letter\|173}}
	==Summary==		==Summary==
−	Tolkien told of the publishing of ''[[The Return of the King]]'' on [[October 20]] and the O'Donnell lecture on [[October 21]]. Tolkien was well pleased with the reception, but did not think it would cause a new trend in literature.<ref>We can now safely say he did...</ref> He was pleased with the published ''The Return of the King'', but felt it incomplete if there was nothing on [[Samwise Gamgee\|Samwise]] and [[Elanor Gardner\|Elanor]].<ref>He was probably referring to ''[[The Epilogue]]'', as published in ''[[Sauron Defeated]]''. It was going to be included, but was considered too anti-climactic.</ref>	+	Tolkien told of the publishing of ''[[The Return of the King]]'' on [[20 October\|October 20]] and the O'Donnell lecture on [[October 21]]. Tolkien was well pleased with the reception, but did not think it would cause a new trend in literature.<ref>We can now safely say he did...</ref> He was pleased with the published ''The Return of the King'', but felt it incomplete if there was nothing on [[Samwise Gamgee\|Samwise]] and [[Elanor Gardner\|Elanor]].<ref>He was probably referring to ''[[The Epilogue]]'', as published in ''[[Sauron Defeated]]''. It was going to be included, but was considered too anti-climactic.</ref>

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	<references/>		<references/>
	{{letters}}		{{letters}}

Gamling at 19:48, 9 May 2011

2011-05-09T19:48:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 9 May 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	}}{{letter\|173}}		}}{{letter\|173}}
	==Summary==		==Summary==
−	Tolkien ~~tells~~ of the publishing of ''[[The Return of the King]]'' on [[October 20]] and the O'Donnell lecture on [[October 21]]. Tolkien is well pleased with the reception, but ~~does~~ not think it ~~will~~ cause a new trend in literature.<ref>We can now safely say he did...</ref> He is pleased with the published ''The Return of the King'', but ~~feels~~ it incomplete if there was nothing on [[Samwise Gamgee\|Samwise]] and [[Elanor Gardner\|Elanor]].<ref>He is probably referring to ''[[The Epilogue]]'', as published in ''[[Sauron Defeated]]''. It was going to be included, but was considered too anti-climactic.</ref>	+	Tolkien told of the publishing of ''[[The Return of the King]]'' on [[October 20]] and the O'Donnell lecture on [[October 21]]. Tolkien was well pleased with the reception, but did not think it would cause a new trend in literature.<ref>We can now safely say he did...</ref> He was pleased with the published ''The Return of the King'', but felt it incomplete if there was nothing on [[Samwise Gamgee\|Samwise]] and [[Elanor Gardner\|Elanor]].<ref>He was probably referring to ''[[The Epilogue]]'', as published in ''[[Sauron Defeated]]''. It was going to be included, but was considered too anti-climactic.</ref>

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	<references/>		<references/>
	{{letters}}		{{letters}}

Ederchil at 09:43, 31 August 2010

2010-08-31T09:43:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 31 August 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	{{letter\|173}}	+	{{letter infobox
		+	\| #=173
		+	\| to=[[Katherine Farrer]]
		+	\| date=[[1955#October\|October 24]], [[1955]]
		+	\| subject=''[[The Return of the King]]'', publication
		+	}}{{letter\|173}}
	==Summary==		==Summary==
−	~~This fragment~~ of ~~a letter, dated [[October 24]], [[1955]], was written to Katherine Farrer. It discusses~~ the publishing of ''[[The Return of the King]]'' on [[October 20]] and the O'Donnell lecture on [[October 21]]. Tolkien is well pleased with the reception, but does not think it will cause a new trend in literature<ref>We can now safely say he did...</ref>. He is pleased with the published ''The Return of the King'', but feels it incomplete if there was nothing on [[Samwise Gamgee\|Samwise]] and [[Elanor Gardner\|Elanor]].<ref>He is probably referring to ''[[The Epilogue]]'', as published in ''[[Sauron Defeated]]''. It was going to be included, but was considered too anti-climactic.</ref>	+	Tolkien tells of the publishing of ''[[The Return of the King]]'' on [[October 20]] and the O'Donnell lecture on [[October 21]]. Tolkien is well pleased with the reception, but does not think it will cause a new trend in literature.<ref>We can now safely say he did...</ref> He is pleased with the published ''The Return of the King'', but feels it incomplete if there was nothing on [[Samwise Gamgee\|Samwise]] and [[Elanor Gardner\|Elanor]].<ref>He is probably referring to ''[[The Epilogue]]'', as published in ''[[Sauron Defeated]]''. It was going to be included, but was considered too anti-climactic.</ref>

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	<references/>		<references/>
	{{letters}}		{{letters}}

Ederchil: New page: {{letter|173}} ==Summary== This fragment of a letter, dated October 24, 1955, was written to Katherine Farrer. It discusses the publishing of ''The Return of the King'' on [[Oc...

2008-10-22T08:02:06Z

New page: {{letter|173}} ==Summary== This fragment of a letter, dated October 24, 1955, was written to Katherine Farrer. It discusses the publishing of ''The Return of the King'' on [[Oc...

New page

{{letter|173}}
==Summary==
This fragment of a letter, dated [[October 24]], [[1955]], was written to Katherine Farrer. It discusses the publishing of ''[[The Return of the King]]'' on [[October 20]] and the O'Donnell lecture on [[October 21]]. Tolkien is well pleased with the reception, but does not think it will cause a new trend in literature<ref>We can now safely say he did...</ref>. He is pleased with the published ''The Return of the King'', but feels it incomplete if there was nothing on [[Samwise Gamgee|Samwise]] and [[Elanor Gardner|Elanor]].<ref>He is probably referring to ''[[The Epilogue]]'', as published in ''[[Sauron Defeated]]''. It was going to be included, but was considered too anti-climactic.</ref>

==Notes==
<references/>
{{letters}}