Talk:Ainulindalë: Difference between revisions
KingAragorn (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Because I believed TG and didn't consult the source material I thought that the exact name for the first section of ''The Silmarillion'' was "''The'' Ainulindalë". However, it i...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Because I believed TG and didn't consult the source material I thought that the exact name for the first section of ''The Silmarillion'' was "''The'' Ainulindalë". However, it is, of course, simply "Ainulindalë". Furthermore it is not a chapter and should not have been called "Ainulindalë (chapter)". Therefore I think that this should be moved to "Ainulindalë" and the <nowiki>"{{disambig-more|Ainulindalë|[[Ainulindalë (disambiguation)]]}}"</nowiki> at the top should be sufficient to alert readers to the disambiguation. What do you think? Also, "Ainulindalë" ''is'' a chapter of ''[[The Lost Road and Other Writings]]''; therefore should we call that article "Ainulindalë (chapter)"? If what I have proposed is agreed the current redirect pages "Ainulindalë" and "Ainulindalë (chapter)" will need to be deleted to make way for the two article moves. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 15:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | Because I believed TG and didn't consult the source material I thought that the exact name for the first section of ''The Silmarillion'' was "''The'' Ainulindalë". However, it is, of course, simply "Ainulindalë". Furthermore it is not a chapter and should not have been called "Ainulindalë (chapter)". Therefore I think that this should be moved to "Ainulindalë" and the <nowiki>"{{disambig-more|Ainulindalë|[[Ainulindalë (disambiguation)]]}}"</nowiki> at the top should be sufficient to alert readers to the disambiguation. What do you think? Also, "Ainulindalë" ''is'' a chapter of ''[[The Lost Road and Other Writings]]''; therefore should we call that article "Ainulindalë (chapter)"? If what I have proposed is agreed the current redirect pages "Ainulindalë" and "Ainulindalë (chapter)" will need to be deleted to make way for the two article moves. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 15:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
:We also have the article "Ainulindalë (Morgoth's Ring)". | |||
:I'm not sure how to deal with this. If I personally searched for Ainulindalë, I would like to know stuff like: what does the name refer to, in which books can I find info about the concept, how did the concept evolve in Tolkien's works, etc. Is it that usual that people are looking for summaries of chapters/parts of books?--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 18:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:52, 28 September 2011
Because I believed TG and didn't consult the source material I thought that the exact name for the first section of The Silmarillion was "The Ainulindalë". However, it is, of course, simply "Ainulindalë". Furthermore it is not a chapter and should not have been called "Ainulindalë (chapter)". Therefore I think that this should be moved to "Ainulindalë" and the "{{disambig-more|Ainulindalë|[[Ainulindalë (disambiguation)]]}}" at the top should be sufficient to alert readers to the disambiguation. What do you think? Also, "Ainulindalë" is a chapter of The Lost Road and Other Writings; therefore should we call that article "Ainulindalë (chapter)"? If what I have proposed is agreed the current redirect pages "Ainulindalë" and "Ainulindalë (chapter)" will need to be deleted to make way for the two article moves. -- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 15:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- We also have the article "Ainulindalë (Morgoth's Ring)".
- I'm not sure how to deal with this. If I personally searched for Ainulindalë, I would like to know stuff like: what does the name refer to, in which books can I find info about the concept, how did the concept evolve in Tolkien's works, etc. Is it that usual that people are looking for summaries of chapters/parts of books?--Morgan 18:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
