Tolkien Gateway

Talk:Celebrant

(Difference between revisions)
m
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
:::I don't, but Dwarvish words becomes awfully empty otherwise :) --{{User:Ederchil/sig}} 22:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:::I don't, but Dwarvish words becomes awfully empty otherwise :) --{{User:Ederchil/sig}} 22:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::: :), yeah, but we have articles on both kibil and nâla, so that could suffice, I would say.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 22:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:59, 23 July 2011

We need to decided which of this should be the main article: Celebrant, Silverlode, or Kibil-nâla (and add Template:main to the non-mains), in order not to confuse readers (and editors!). I would perhaps say Celebrant.--Morgan 22:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

I agree on Celebrant, Silverlode can be a redirect and Kibil-nâla a language article. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
More than one article for one concept?!! *head explodes*. Ederchil, I thought you didn't agree with multiple articles? -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  22:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
I don't, but Dwarvish words becomes awfully empty otherwise :) --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 :), yeah, but we have articles on both kibil and nâla, so that could suffice, I would say.--Morgan 22:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)