Talk:Celebrant: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 24 July 2011 by Mith
mNo edit summary |
m (Celebrant FTW) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::: :), yeah, but we have articles on both kibil and nâla, so that could suffice, I would say.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 22:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC) | :::: :), yeah, but we have articles on both kibil and nâla, so that could suffice, I would say.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 22:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::+1 to one article at "Celebrant" (Kibil-nâla as a redirect can be categorised). --{{User:Mith/sig}} 09:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:03, 24 July 2011
We need to decided which of this should be the main article: Celebrant, Silverlode, or Kibil-nâla (and add Template:main to the non-mains), in order not to confuse readers (and editors!). I would perhaps say Celebrant.--Morgan 22:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree on Celebrant, Silverlode can be a redirect and Kibil-nâla a language article. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- More than one article for one concept?!! *head explodes*. Ederchil, I thought you didn't agree with multiple articles? -- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 22:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- :), yeah, but we have articles on both kibil and nâla, so that could suffice, I would say.--Morgan 22:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
