Tolkien Gateway

Talk:Celebrant

(Difference between revisions)
m (Celebrant FTW)
m
 
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
:::::+1 to one article at "Celebrant" (Kibil-nâla as a redirect can be categorised). --{{User:Mith/sig}} 09:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:::::+1 to one article at "Celebrant" (Kibil-nâla as a redirect can be categorised). --{{User:Mith/sig}} 09:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
::::::Main article: Celebrant
 +
::::::Redirect to main article: Silverlode
 +
::::::Language article: Kibil-nâla --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 11:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:56, 24 July 2011

We need to decided which of this should be the main article: Celebrant, Silverlode, or Kibil-nâla (and add Template:main to the non-mains), in order not to confuse readers (and editors!). I would perhaps say Celebrant.--Morgan 22:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

I agree on Celebrant, Silverlode can be a redirect and Kibil-nâla a language article. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
More than one article for one concept?!! *head explodes*. Ederchil, I thought you didn't agree with multiple articles? -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  22:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
I don't, but Dwarvish words becomes awfully empty otherwise :) --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 :), yeah, but we have articles on both kibil and nâla, so that could suffice, I would say.--Morgan 22:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
+1 to one article at "Celebrant" (Kibil-nâla as a redirect can be categorised). --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 09:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Main article: Celebrant
Redirect to main article: Silverlode
Language article: Kibil-nâla --Amroth 11:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)