Talk:Dwarves of Belegost

From Tolkien Gateway
Revision as of 23:20, 4 November 2011 by Dwarf Lord (talk | contribs)

Latest comment: 4 November 2011 by Dwarf Lord

Merge with Broadbeams? Or the other way around? Or keep as separate articles?--Morgan 15:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since the identification of the Broadbeams as Dwarves of Belegost is not absolute but an interpretation, I'd say no. --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 16:23, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'd also say "no" in that races and locations should be separated. E.g. Teleri and Falathrim, Men and Gondorians and, for best comparison, Durin's Folk is separated from Dwarves of Khazad-dûm. Furthermore, although we can't know, isn't it unlikely Broadbeams were just restricted to Belegost? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 17:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Actually, we don't know if the Broadbeams were supposed to "be" the Dwarves of Belegost (same with Firebards/Dwarves of Nogrod). I've edited all the related articles and removed the conjecture.--Morgan 17:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So, you agree with me? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 14:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agree to what? --Morgan 15:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That they shouldn't be merged? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 16:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No to merge.--Morgan 16:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
no merge. For the reasons stated. Besides I created these different articles because it seemed like a good idea to have articles that refer to people of specific regions or cities because it's specific and give more detail about each one compared to just generalized articles. --Dwarf Lord 23:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]