Tolkien Gateway

Talk:Errantry

Revision as of 14:09, 1 September 2010 by Mithbot (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Should "Dumbledor" have a seperate article? --Narfil Palùrfalas 13:52, 20 June 2006 (EDT)

I think so. I've thrown up a stub over at Dumbledors, the plural to go with the standard of Orcs, Men, Elves, etc. --Hyarion 14:23, 20 June 2006 (EDT)

[edit] Dumbledor

I'm not entirely comfortable with referencing David Day in either this article or Dumbledors to be honest. I can't actually find any other source to back up his claim, can anyone else? Loads of websites say that same thing but they all reference David Day (which I don't think is healthy). --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 11:37, 14 January 2008 (EST)

Well, if we built in a heavy caveat emptor in the Bestiary article, and put up a noncanon tag on every reference to it, shouldn't that be enough? Ederchil 11:43, 14 January 2008 (EST)

[edit] Song of Earendil vs. Errantry

‘A much shorter version would be included in The Fellowship of the Ring: the Song of Eärendil.’

Careful comparison has led me to believe – and I think this belief reasonably well-founded – that the Song of Earendil is in fact much longer than Errantry ;-) But the relationship of these two poems deserves a much lengthier discussion anyway, that’s why I didn’t edit this myself straightaway. 134.93.50.217 23:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)