Talk:Gondor: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
(mindless reply (must be the coffee)) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::I don't think history is properly sourced yet. All I did was add semi-secondary sources. And as for Gondorians being a stub... so was [[Númenóreans]]. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 10:51, 28 July 2008 (EDT) | :::I don't think history is properly sourced yet. All I did was add semi-secondary sources. And as for Gondorians being a stub... so was [[Númenóreans]]. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 10:51, 28 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::: Gondorians can be expanded and made into a beautiful article (which IMHO could include "Law" and "Customs" chapters very nicely). Though not by me. :) If it were the [[Rohirrim]] maybe. "Hail, Éomer!" so on and so forth :) (just reached my 5th grade behavior peak :p) ~~ [[User:Þelma|Þelma]] 11:30, 28 July 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:30, 28 July 2008
FA Status
This article has most of the qualities required to be nominated for Featured Article status. It's pretty well written, stable, and is well-illustrated. The one thing it lacks is references. Let's get them put in, and add to the nomination queue. I'll help.--Theoden1 19:20, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
- I've added "Languages" and improved "Etymology". However, there is room for more. Currently, the article is mostly history. Should this article include sections like "Law" and "Customs", or does that belong on Gondorians? -- Ederchil 03:36, 28 July 2008 (EDT)
- Excellent-- it's now worthy of nomination. The additional section should be put here. Plus, Gondorians is only a stub at present.--Theoden1 10:37, 28 July 2008 (EDT)
- I don't think history is properly sourced yet. All I did was add semi-secondary sources. And as for Gondorians being a stub... so was Númenóreans. -- Ederchil 10:51, 28 July 2008 (EDT)
