Talk:High Hallow: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 28 September 2016 by Sage in topic Source of name
(Created page with "==Source of name== I don't find this name either in {{HM|Guide}} nor in LOTR. I found the name only in Atlas index, but I can't trace the source. ~~~~")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Source of name==
==Source of name==
I don't find this name either in {{HM|Guide}} nor in LOTR. I found the name only in Atlas index, but I can't trace the source. [[User:Sage|Sage]] 09:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
I don't find this name either in {{HM|Guide}} nor in LOTR. I found the name only in Atlas index, but I can't trace the source. [[User:Sage|Sage]] 09:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
:It is mentioned in the chapter "The Steward and the King" when Gandalf leads Aragorn to the mountains but not as a proper name: "But Gandalf took
Aragorn out from the City by night, and he brought him to the southern feet of Mount Mindolluin; and there they found a path made in ages past that few now dared to tread. For it led up on to the mountain to a '''high hallow''' where only the kings had been wont to go.''' I haven't checked the index of the LotR; if it is not considered even there as a place-name, the article should maybe be discarded. --Tik 12:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:00, 28 September 2016

Source of name

I don't find this name either in Robert Foster, The Complete Guide to Middle-earth nor in LOTR. I found the name only in Atlas index, but I can't trace the source. Sage 09:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is mentioned in the chapter "The Steward and the King" when Gandalf leads Aragorn to the mountains but not as a proper name: "But Gandalf took

Aragorn out from the City by night, and he brought him to the southern feet of Mount Mindolluin; and there they found a path made in ages past that few now dared to tread. For it led up on to the mountain to a high hallow where only the kings had been wont to go. I haven't checked the index of the LotR; if it is not considered even there as a place-name, the article should maybe be discarded. --Tik 12:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)