Talk:Khazad-dûm: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 19 June 2011 by Amroth in topic Move
m (→‎Move: One will be getting killed)
Line 12: Line 12:


:::Well, the policy is supposedly that we ''don't'' have multiple articles about alternative names for the same thing. So I will be killing either Moria or Khazad-dûm; I'd rather it were Khazad-dûm. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 16:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
:::Well, the policy is supposedly that we ''don't'' have multiple articles about alternative names for the same thing. So I will be killing either Moria or Khazad-dûm; I'd rather it were Khazad-dûm. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 16:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
::::As far as I know [http://www.tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Forum:Characters_with_multiple_names our goals] is to create an article for every name of a character, which includes the etymology of the name and when and by who the name was used. --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 16:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:55, 19 June 2011

Could use some help

I am wanting to merge Moria and Khazad-dum together, but I need your opinions and help remodeling this page. --Dwarf Lord 13:09, 9 April 2008 (EDT)

Move

Why can't we move this to Moria? Surely the primary name of the place. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 13:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wouldn't mind.--Morgan 14:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If we keep Khazad-dûm as an article about the name Khazad-dûm, I'm in favour of that. --Amroth 14:56, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, the policy is supposedly that we don't have multiple articles about alternative names for the same thing. So I will be killing either Moria or Khazad-dûm; I'd rather it were Khazad-dûm. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 16:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As far as I know our goals is to create an article for every name of a character, which includes the etymology of the name and when and by who the name was used. --Amroth 16:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]