First of all: Page titles such as Barahir grandson of Faramir should be avoided as much as possible. Only when there are more than one Barahirs should this be used. If you have to do this, do it this way: Barahir (grandson of Faramir) so you don't forget whether or not you added that dratted comma...
Further it might be an idea to add a sort of "pub" for this kind of discussions. - Bokkie 18:04, 3 Sep 2005 (EDT)
Great points. Barahir is one of those names that are used quite frequently, i.e. Barahir son of Bregor, Barahir son of Hador, Barahir grandson of Faramir, etc. In the beginning I was debating whether to do the parenthesis or not, but now that you bring it up, it is most likely something that we need to use.
A portal for discussion other than the main page is a good idea too, I'll try and think of a good name for something, although Portal might work, heh.
Thanks for your comments. --Hyarion 16:45, 5 Sep 2005 (EDT)
Very intresting wiki site!... Thanx! --18.104.22.168 18:31, 15 October 2005 (EDT)
- Thanks for the compliment :) It's people like you who keep me motivated. --Hyarion 18:45, 15 October 2005 (EDT)
Is the content here GFDL? Gimli 07:18, 6 March 2006 (EST)
- What do you mean? --Earendilyon 07:36, 6 March 2006 (EST)
- I mean is it available under the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License - can it be copied to other sites under the provisions of that licence? Also if content has been copied from wikipedia, shouldnt it be acknowledged? Gimli 08:30, 6 March 2006 (EST)
Main page redesign
I'm trying to redesign the main page a bit so as to not scare off any visitors. If you have any suggestions just let me know and I'll add them. The introduction text should probably be rewritten, possibly shorter. I also think instead of a featured image and a featured article we could showcase a featured article with an image from that article, and a bit more text directly from the article. --Hyarion 16:12, 23 April 2006 (EDT)
- IMO, the link to Welcome in the opening sentence is unnecessary, as the welcome message is just below it. Coupling the featured picture to the featured article is a sound idea if you'd ask me; gives the page some more coherence *thumbs up*. --Earendilyon 17:04, 23 April 2006 (EDT)
- Hm, good point I can take it off for now, eventually I'd like to remove the welcome statement from the main page and add it to the welcome page, and then also add a Tolkien Gateway page with information about the site if the welcome is not enough (and link to that as well). Then we can focus on news / featured articles / navigation links, hopefully it will be self-explanatory enough that people won't get confused, though I doubt many even read the paragraph. I'll try and get a Featured article page rotation going so people can submit possible featured articles, vote on them, and move them onto the main page a bit faster, as now it's just random. --Hyarion 17:10, 23 April 2006 (EDT)
Purpose of site?
This is going to come across badly, I'm sure, so I apologize in advance for my skepticism. But, er, what exactly is the purpose of the Tolkien Gateway as opposed to the various other Tolkien wikis online (or, for that matter, Wikipedia itself)? In particular, it looks like a number of the articles here are at least currently based on the corresponding entries from Wikipedia. What was the argument for branching them off to form a separate site rather than simply improving them in place? (Not that I object to the impulse to create one's own site, mind you! But I feel some level of concern about fragmentation of effort.) Steuard --22.214.171.124 12:24, 31 May 2006 (EDT)
Adding my own header as it looks like I've gone off and written a novel
Hello Steuard, what an honor to have you here, make yourself at home :) Don't worry, your question doesn't come across badly as why we are here is an important question.
Your first question is why should we be here when there are other Tolkien wikis, good question. We’ve been around for over 3 years now, well before much of the hype surrounding wikis and when everyone and their grandmother decided to have one. With almost 4,500 articles we are currently the largest and most active Tolkien-related wiki or encyclopedia for that matter. With hundreds of updates a day, we are really growing fast and it becomes much more than one person could do on their own.
There are a couple other wikis that I have knowledge of, The Tolkien Wiki being one. I’m not a fan of that particular engine and unfortunately the activity is minimal but Walter is a great guy. Then there is lotr.wikia.com which started later and though at first they stated they were concentrating on The Lord of the Rings it seems they have since changed and now have MERP related articles, I'm not sure where they are heading to be honest (not to sound rude I hope as I honestly don't). They also have advertisements and are a for-profit company, I don’t think the Tolkien Estate will be very pleased. There’s also a few non-English Tolkien wikis, Ardapedia and Kontu Wiki, I actually convinced Merri to start the Finnish wiki and he has done a great job with it. We are also considering expanding into other languages as well but we will probably concentrate on English for the next few years before trying to expand.
Wikipedia is a great project but unfortunately they can only concentrate on the major Tolkien-related articles. While we focus on everything, including essays, reviews, music, publications, collectibles, images, etc. Wookieepedia is an example of where we are heading as they have well over 30,000 articles, by far too many for any environment not specializing on the subject.
You will notice that some articles have roots from Wikipedia, yes. When we started out we borrowed some content from them as is allowed with the GNU FDL. However we have greatly improved on those articles and have been rewriting them from the ground up constantly. You will find many of our editors on the site still contribute to the Tolkien articles on Wikipedia and we are by no means trying to mimic what they do.
It seems the above still doesn’t create a convincing answer so here are some raw projects that we are working on that we would not be able to accomplish on Wikipedia:
- We are listing all Amon Hen, Mallorn, Beyond Bree, Orcrist, LotR Fan Club, Tolkien Journal, Parma Nole, Lembas Extra, Arda, etc. journals and putting their contents and cover page on their own articles. The article will of course contain links to purchase the back issue as well as the official site of the publication.
- We also received the rights this week to store all of the Fraud of the Rings comics, this is something not even freely available on the official site.
- The Tolkien Google logo petition is something else Wikipedia would not condone.
- Screenplays for purists and The Hobbit are other projects we currently are working on.
- We also are trying to have an article for every single Tolkien-related game.
- Archiving any and all Tolkien imagery
- Listing any and all Tolkien-inspired music
- Listing all collectibles related to Tolkien and his works
- Listing all books related to the Professor and his works
This being said our main goal is focusing on the legendarium and the Tolkien-inspired items are only a secondary objective.
It is probably better to look at Tolkien Gateway as a community more so than simply a wiki. We also run TolkienNews.net and host sites such the North East Tolkien Society, ShirePost.com, and a few more on the horizon. We also run the Tolkien IRC Network which averages 20-30 users in the main lobby and hosts sites such as minastirith.com, ancanar.com, herenistarion.org, imladris.dk, lotrosource.com, ardapost.com, etc.
Now that just looks like one big advertisement…sorry about that. If you need me to be more specific on something please let me know. We are always very open to new ideas and if you have any suggestions please let us know.
One thing I’ve been meaning to talk to you about is linking to your FAQ as well as the newsgroups. What we’ve been doing with Tolkien forums is when there is a specific topic being discussed, such as the whereabouts of the Entwives, we link our article to their thread. I’d like to do this with both the Meta-FAQ and newsgroups so for example on our article on the Shire we could link to your FAQ on whether the Shire was meant to be England, etc.
Thanks for dropping by as it means a lot to us, and keep up the great work on your sites! --Hyarion 14:05, 31 May 2006 (EDT)
- Good answer. :) It does sound like you'll be much freer to add information on "minor" topics here than you would be on a broad site like Wikipedia; I think you've convinced me that it's a good idea. I hope that some level of cross-fertilization goes on between the community here and the community there.
- As for my Meta-FAQ (and related work), you are of course welcome to link to any bits of it that you think would be useful. (That's something else that some folks might have a problem with on Wikipedia, come to think of it.) I've always wished that I had time to track down the best Usenet newsgroup threads to link to for each of my FAQ topics, but real life keeps me too busy these days to consider such a major project. It would have been much easier if, like you, I'd started keeping track of the threads at the same time that I started writing the FAQ! In any case, best wishes with the site, and many thanks for your detailed answer to my question. Steuard --126.96.36.199 16:23, 31 May 2006 (EDT)