Talk:Númenor: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
(Added reply) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:You and your redirects :p I definitely think '''Númenor''' and the '''Fall of Númenor''' are entirely different and should be left separate. If we need to remove the bulk of information on the actual destruction from Númenor to the Fall of Númenor article then that would be fine by me. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 18:06, 17 May 2006 (EDT) | :You and your redirects :p I definitely think '''Númenor''' and the '''Fall of Númenor''' are entirely different and should be left separate. If we need to remove the bulk of information on the actual destruction from Númenor to the Fall of Númenor article then that would be fine by me. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 18:06, 17 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
::I was just wondering. We have I think three Fall of Númenor links, and I didn't know whether you wanted them together or seperate. I agree that a seperate article would be best. Thanks! --[[User:Narfil Palùrfalas|Narfil Palùrfalas]] 05:32, 18 May 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:32, 18 May 2006
There are several links to the Fall of Númenor. Should that and this article be seperate, or should Fall of Númenor redirect to here? --Narfil Palùrfalas 16:53, 17 May 2006 (EDT)
- You and your redirects :p I definitely think Númenor and the Fall of Númenor are entirely different and should be left separate. If we need to remove the bulk of information on the actual destruction from Númenor to the Fall of Númenor article then that would be fine by me. --Hyarion 18:06, 17 May 2006 (EDT)
- I was just wondering. We have I think three Fall of Númenor links, and I didn't know whether you wanted them together or seperate. I agree that a seperate article would be best. Thanks! --Narfil Palùrfalas 05:32, 18 May 2006 (EDT)
