Talk:Noakes Family: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 10 September 2013 by Morgan
KingAragorn (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::The reason I raise this issue is because the Independent's crossword apparently had the answer "Noakes" to a clue about working class hobbits...--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 09:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | ::The reason I raise this issue is because the Independent's crossword apparently had the answer "Noakes" to a clue about working class hobbits...--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 09:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::I agree on the inappropriateness. Could the concept perhaps be derived from Foster's ''Guide''? I'll try to remember to have a look later.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:00, 10 September 2013
I can't find any explanation for why the Noakes should be described as working-class. Any help?-- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 21:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Probably because of the company they kept? Old Noakes hung around with other working class families. --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's probably why. But I think the term is inappropriate - as an encyclopedia we can't really assign the post-Industrial British class system to the anachronistic Shire unless Tolkien said so explicitly.
- The reason I raise this issue is because the Independent's crossword apparently had the answer "Noakes" to a clue about working class hobbits...-- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 09:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I agree on the inappropriateness. Could the concept perhaps be derived from Foster's Guide? I'll try to remember to have a look later.--Morgan 21:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)