Talk:Othrongroth: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 30 January 2012 by Morgan in topic Non-canon
mNo edit summary |
m (Relinked cat) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Non-canon== | ==Non-canon== | ||
After seeing Morgan's edit, I remembered a point I wanted discuss a time ago. We've several [[:Category:Characters from | After seeing Morgan's edit, I remembered a point I wanted discuss a time ago. We've several [[:Category:Characters from adaptations|non-canon categories]], which mostly or only include adaptations characters. Stricly spoken this is correct, as adaptations are indeed non-canon. But I think we should not put adaptation articles in the same category as articles on concepts created by Tolkien. I would prefer if we replace 'Noncanon "Race"' with '"Race" in Adaptations'. --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 14:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Yep, I agree with Amroth. We must distinguish between these two type of sources.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 15:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | :Yep, I agree with Amroth. We must distinguish between these two type of sources.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 15:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:57, 17 July 2015
Non-canon[edit source]
After seeing Morgan's edit, I remembered a point I wanted discuss a time ago. We've several non-canon categories, which mostly or only include adaptations characters. Stricly spoken this is correct, as adaptations are indeed non-canon. But I think we should not put adaptation articles in the same category as articles on concepts created by Tolkien. I would prefer if we replace 'Noncanon "Race"' with '"Race" in Adaptations'. --Amroth 14:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, I agree with Amroth. We must distinguish between these two type of sources.--Morgan 15:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
