Talk:Radagast: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary
 
(Added reply)
Line 1: Line 1:
I don't think it's fair to say that Radagast "did not contribute to Sauron's downfall"; I like to think that he at least had some small part in Sauron's defeat - this is considering (as the article says) that Radagast was mysterious and little is known about him. However I still doubt Radagast succeeded in his purpose in Middle-earth as far as Gandalf did.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 17:15, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
I don't think it's fair to say that Radagast "did not contribute to Sauron's downfall"; I like to think that he at least had some small part in Sauron's defeat - this is considering (as the article says) that Radagast was mysterious and little is known about him. However I still doubt Radagast succeeded in his purpose in Middle-earth as far as Gandalf did.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 17:15, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
:Agreed, I've changed it to "but there is no record of him contributing to the downfall of Sauron." --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 17:35, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:35, 18 June 2008

I don't think it's fair to say that Radagast "did not contribute to Sauron's downfall"; I like to think that he at least had some small part in Sauron's defeat - this is considering (as the article says) that Radagast was mysterious and little is known about him. However I still doubt Radagast succeeded in his purpose in Middle-earth as far as Gandalf did.-- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  17:15, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

Agreed, I've changed it to "but there is no record of him contributing to the downfall of Sauron." --Hyarion 17:35, 18 June 2008 (EDT)