Talk:The Atlas of Middle-earth: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Also useful might be the inclusion of [[Tarnost]] on pp 88-9, and the inclusion of "Sackville" as a town name (70-1). And maybe something about "things that are now shown to be incorrect", like Hardbottle. Fonstad placed it in the SF, but [[Nomenclature]] placed it in the NF. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 04:56, 6 August 2008 (EDT) | Also useful might be the inclusion of [[Tarnost]] on pp 88-9, and the inclusion of "Sackville" as a town name (70-1). And maybe something about "things that are now shown to be incorrect", like Hardbottle. Fonstad placed it in the SF, but [[Nomenclature]] placed it in the NF. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 04:56, 6 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
:I am not aware of these, so I would love it if you could make the additions. Also, I am afraid if the article is a bit too negative. I really love this book. [[User:Sage|Sage]] 05:27, 6 August 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:27, 6 August 2008
Oakbottom
I added that one to Oatbarton some time ago, but can't find reference anymore. It's spelled correctly on 70-1.
Also useful might be the inclusion of Tarnost on pp 88-9, and the inclusion of "Sackville" as a town name (70-1). And maybe something about "things that are now shown to be incorrect", like Hardbottle. Fonstad placed it in the SF, but Nomenclature placed it in the NF. -- Ederchil 04:56, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
- I am not aware of these, so I would love it if you could make the additions. Also, I am afraid if the article is a bit too negative. I really love this book. Sage 05:27, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
