Talk:Third Age 3019
(Difference between revisions)
Earendilyon (Talk | contribs) |
(Added reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Legolas|Legolas]] raised a valid point, if I may say so, by wondering whether this article "really need[s] so many links". Is one link not enough when someone or something is mentioned the first time? --[[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 14:44, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | [[User:Legolas|Legolas]] raised a valid point, if I may say so, by wondering whether this article "really need[s] so many links". Is one link not enough when someone or something is mentioned the first time? --[[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 14:44, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :In all the other articles I would agree, but the reason in those articles I only link the first mention is due to the visitor most likely reading from top to bottom. I guess I just think if I was reading a timeline I'm going to be looking for a specific year, so if I jump down to a specific year, I want to be able to click a link to continue, not have to scroll up looking for the first mention. But it's up to you guys, the article is pretty link-filled. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 14:49, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:49, 31 March 2007
Legolas raised a valid point, if I may say so, by wondering whether this article "really need[s] so many links". Is one link not enough when someone or something is mentioned the first time? --Earendilyon 14:44, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
- In all the other articles I would agree, but the reason in those articles I only link the first mention is due to the visitor most likely reading from top to bottom. I guess I just think if I was reading a timeline I'm going to be looking for a specific year, so if I jump down to a specific year, I want to be able to click a link to continue, not have to scroll up looking for the first mention. But it's up to you guys, the article is pretty link-filled. --Hyarion 14:49, 31 March 2007 (EDT)