Talk:Tollers: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 24 September 2014 by Mith
mNo edit summary
m (I would probably delete)
 
Line 5: Line 5:


:It's not a pejorative, it's a description. Somewhat harsh, but truth. However, that would derail the discussion. I've removed the speculation from the article, and without it, it's... minimal. Does anyone know of something to add to this? --{{User:Ederchil/sig}} 21:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
:It's not a pejorative, it's a description. Somewhat harsh, but truth. However, that would derail the discussion. I've removed the speculation from the article, and without it, it's... minimal. Does anyone know of something to add to this? --{{User:Ederchil/sig}} 21:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
::I'm not convinced that this needs to exist as its own article. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 23:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:25, 24 September 2014

"It is not known the reason for the nickname.". Apart from the deplorable grammar, isn't this just the regular Oxford "-er"? --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 19:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since I started to contribute to the TolkienGateway, Ederchil insists always mock me or even use pejorative. It seems something personal (and I do not understand why). I ask for respect here and educated manners. If you find something wrong in what I do please correct it. There is no need for anything more than that.Thank you. --(Sigurd 21:07, 24 September 2014 (UTC)).Reply[reply]

It's not a pejorative, it's a description. Somewhat harsh, but truth. However, that would derail the discussion. I've removed the speculation from the article, and without it, it's... minimal. Does anyone know of something to add to this? --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 21:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm not convinced that this needs to exist as its own article. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 23:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]