Talk:Zigil-nâd: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Earendilyon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Earendilyon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::I don't know whether there's already some policy formulated on this point. ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 13:07, 16 January 2008 (EST) | :::I don't know whether there's already some policy formulated on this point. ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 13:07, 16 January 2008 (EST) | ||
:::There's already some discussion on a similar issue @ [[Forum:Multiple title redirects]]. ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 13:10, 16 January 2008 (EST) |
Revision as of 18:10, 16 January 2008
Delete? This name was obviously scrapped. -- Ederchil 11:16, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- I'd rather say: put a non-canon marker in the article. ~ Earendilyon 11:38, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- It's non-canon, but it is completely ridiculous to give this its own entry. Should all scrapped names from HoMe have an own entry? -- Ederchil 12:44, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- I don't know whether there's already some policy formulated on this point. ~ Earendilyon 13:07, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- There's already some discussion on a similar issue @ Forum:Multiple title redirects. ~ Earendilyon 13:10, 16 January 2008 (EST)