Talk:Zigil-nâd: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


:::I don't know whether there's already some policy formulated on this point. ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 13:07, 16 January 2008 (EST)
:::I don't know whether there's already some policy formulated on this point. ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 13:07, 16 January 2008 (EST)
:::There's already some discussion on a similar issue @ [[Forum:Multiple title redirects]]. ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 13:10, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 18:10, 16 January 2008

Delete? This name was obviously scrapped. -- Ederchil 11:16, 16 January 2008 (EST)

I'd rather say: put a non-canon marker in the article. ~ Earendilyon 11:38, 16 January 2008 (EST)
It's non-canon, but it is completely ridiculous to give this its own entry. Should all scrapped names from HoMe have an own entry? -- Ederchil 12:44, 16 January 2008 (EST)
I don't know whether there's already some policy formulated on this point. ~ Earendilyon 13:07, 16 January 2008 (EST)
There's already some discussion on a similar issue @ Forum:Multiple title redirects. ~ Earendilyon 13:10, 16 January 2008 (EST)