Template talk:Anon

From Tolkien Gateway
Revision as of 12:40, 26 January 2011 by Myrtone (talk | contribs) (Could they change their minds)

Should this template be deleted now login is requried to edit?  Myrtonos  forum  c  #  at 08:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, as the login requirement is only a "temporary" measure. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 11:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Should it be temporary? How about getting a consensus before restoring anonymous editing. Logging in to edit increases privacy as the IP address is not recorded in the edit history. This extension will make account creation easier. --  Myrtonos  forum  contr  

  1.   11:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Having discussed this thoroughly last summer, I would say that it is accurate to say that there is already a consensus that it should be temporary. I, along with others, only reluctantly agreed to the current measures on the basis that it were temporary. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 12:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't realise it had already been discussed, will all those people change their minds if the OpenID extension were installed. --  Myrtonos  forum  contr  

  1.   12:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC)