Template talk:Webcite: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


What should we do with links to TG? --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 20:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
What should we do with links to TG? --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 20:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I always keep forgeting some of the fields. "Articleurl" and "articlename" should better be just "url" and "title". Not because I am forgetful but I think it would be easier and perhaps more logical. I am not suggesting to change the field-names but perhaps create an '''or''' function with "url" being understood as a substitute of "articleurl". [[User:Sage|Sage]] 10:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:59, 15 November 2012

Could we add a websiteurl to the template= //§§§§

Why? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What should we do with links to TG? --Amroth 20:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I always keep forgeting some of the fields. "Articleurl" and "articlename" should better be just "url" and "title". Not because I am forgetful but I think it would be easier and perhaps more logical. I am not suggesting to change the field-names but perhaps create an or function with "url" being understood as a substitute of "articleurl". Sage 10:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]