Template talk:Webcite
(Difference between revisions)
KingAragorn (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I always keep forgeting some of the fields. "Articleurl" and "articlename" should better be just "url" and "title". Not because I am forgetful but I think it would be easier and perhaps more logical. I am not suggesting to change the field-names but perhaps create an '''or''' function with "url" being understood as a substitute of "articleurl". [[User:Sage|Sage]] 10:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | I always keep forgeting some of the fields. "Articleurl" and "articlename" should better be just "url" and "title". Not because I am forgetful but I think it would be easier and perhaps more logical. I am not suggesting to change the field-names but perhaps create an '''or''' function with "url" being understood as a substitute of "articleurl". [[User:Sage|Sage]] 10:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I just copy and paste the text from this page.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 17:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:14, 15 November 2012
Could we add a websiteurl to the template= //§§§§
What should we do with links to TG? --Amroth 20:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I always keep forgeting some of the fields. "Articleurl" and "articlename" should better be just "url" and "title". Not because I am forgetful but I think it would be easier and perhaps more logical. I am not suggesting to change the field-names but perhaps create an or function with "url" being understood as a substitute of "articleurl". Sage 10:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- I just copy and paste the text from this page.-- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 17:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)