Tolkien Gateway

Template talk:Webcite

(Difference between revisions)
m (Why?)
m (I'm not changing it!)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:Why? --{{User:Mith/sig}} 22:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:Why? --{{User:Mith/sig}} 22:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
What should we do with links to TG? --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 20:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
I always keep forgeting some of the fields. "Articleurl" and "articlename" should better be just "url" and "title". Not because I am forgetful but I think it would be easier and perhaps more logical. I am not suggesting to change the field-names but perhaps create an '''or''' function with "url" being understood as a substitute of "articleurl". [[User:Sage|Sage]] 10:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I just copy and paste the text from this page.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 17:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Me too, but it would be easier if we didn't have to refer to this page and remind myself whether it's "articlename" or "articletitle" or "title". Multiple and simpler names would work better. [[User:Sage|Sage]] 17:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::No. It was deliberately designed because some people will take "url" to mean website URL whilst "title" could be mistaken for both website name or the title when you hover over a link. I did think about this quite a lot when I made this. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 23:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:26, 15 November 2012

Could we add a websiteurl to the template= //§§§§

Why? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

What should we do with links to TG? --Amroth 20:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

I always keep forgeting some of the fields. "Articleurl" and "articlename" should better be just "url" and "title". Not because I am forgetful but I think it would be easier and perhaps more logical. I am not suggesting to change the field-names but perhaps create an or function with "url" being understood as a substitute of "articleurl". Sage 10:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

I just copy and paste the text from this page.-- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  17:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Me too, but it would be easier if we didn't have to refer to this page and remind myself whether it's "articlename" or "articletitle" or "title". Multiple and simpler names would work better. Sage 17:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
No. It was deliberately designed because some people will take "url" to mean website URL whilst "title" could be mistaken for both website name or the title when you hover over a link. I did think about this quite a lot when I made this. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 23:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC)