Template talk:Webcite: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:I just copy and paste the text from this page.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 17:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | :I just copy and paste the text from this page.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 17:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Me too, but it would be easier if we didn't have to refer to this page and remind myself whether it's "articlename" or "articletitle" or "title". [[User:Sage|Sage]] 17:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | ::Me too, but it would be easier if we didn't have to refer to this page and remind myself whether it's "articlename" or "articletitle" or "title". Multiple and simpler names would work better. [[User:Sage|Sage]] 17:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::No. It was deliberately designed because some people will take "url" to mean website URL whilst "title" could be mistaken for both website name or the title when you hover over a link. I did think about this quite a lot when I made this. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 23:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
<hr /> | |||
I copied the template like I do with all templates and it gave me problems until I realized it doesn't have the <nowiki><ref></nowiki> tags. Why? --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 21:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:28, 12 July 2019
Could we add a websiteurl to the template= //§§§§
What should we do with links to TG? --Amroth 20:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I always keep forgeting some of the fields. "Articleurl" and "articlename" should better be just "url" and "title". Not because I am forgetful but I think it would be easier and perhaps more logical. I am not suggesting to change the field-names but perhaps create an or function with "url" being understood as a substitute of "articleurl". Sage 10:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- I just copy and paste the text from this page.-- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 17:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Me too, but it would be easier if we didn't have to refer to this page and remind myself whether it's "articlename" or "articletitle" or "title". Multiple and simpler names would work better. Sage 17:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I copied the template like I do with all templates and it gave me problems until I realized it doesn't have the <ref> tags. Why? --LorenzoCB 21:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
