Tolkien Gateway

Tolkien Gateway:Requests for adminship

(Difference between revisions)
(Nominee's acceptance)
(made nomination and archiving previous request.)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
==Nominations==
 
==Nominations==
 
OK, Tolkien Gateway, '''the time has come'''.  King Aragorn has made a good point about Hyarion's recent vacation, and I have always felt that there needed to be another admin on TG.  If anything happened to Hy, TG would be crippled.  I therefore nominate the first among the recent vacation triumvirate, '''[[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]]'''.  He has shown himself worthy, an enforcer of TG standards, and a defender against outside disruptions. --[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 21:40, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
 
 
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
===[[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]] (0/0/00)===
 
===[[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]] (0/0/00)===
Line 27: Line 24:
 
====Oppose====
 
====Oppose====
 
====Neutral/comments====
 
====Neutral/comments====
 +
====Nominee's acceptance====
 
-->
 
-->
  
===[[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] (8/5/08)===
+
===[[User:Mith|Mith]] (28/06/10)===
Two week deadline from first request
+
Two week deadline from first request (12/07/10).
  
 
====Support====
 
====Support====
# I '''agree''', [[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] is doing a great job, but if anything were to happen, I think Tolkien Gateway would be in good hands with [[Ederchil]].--[[User:Quidon88|Quidon88]] 22:01, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
+
#I believe that this Wiki needs more sysops, and I believe [[User:Mith|Mith]] meets and exceeds all of the requirements listed above. As we discussed in the last meeting, adminship should not be seen as a promotion, rather a responsibility; I'm confident [[User:Mith|Mith]] will be able to meet the needs of this responsibility.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
# I fully '''agree'''. --[[User:Þelma|Þelma]] 04:49, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
+
#I certainly '''agree''', for all reasons previously stated. Good luck!--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 06:03, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
+
#If anyone can do it I personally '''agree''' that [[Ederchil]] is the person to do it.--{{User:High King Fingolfin/High King Fingolfin}} 23:10, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
+
# I '''agree''', in the time I've been looking in here (and wanting to become much more active, but not finding the time for it), I have noticed Ederchil is always in evidence as keeping things in order somewhere. And must support my fellow countryman ;) -- [[User:Mithrennaith|Mithrennaith]] 22:01, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
+
# I '''agree'', Ederchil has shown no signs of slowing down in activity and continues to contribute high quality content. Ederchil's opinions seem to always mirror my own and I see no reason why he wouldn't make a great administrator.
+
  
 
====Oppose====
 
====Oppose====
Line 45: Line 38:
  
 
====Nominee's acceptance====
 
====Nominee's acceptance====
:Of course. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 02:33, 7 August 2008 (EDT)
 
  
 
[[Category:Tolkien Gateway]]
 
[[Category:Tolkien Gateway]]

Revision as of 21:14, 28 June 2010

This page is for requests for adminship. Voting will last two weeks, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted admin status.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Contents

Requirements

There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Tolkien Gatewayer (or yourself) for adminship.

  1. They have an account under a screenname.
  2. They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
  3. They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
  4. They have had at least some major article creations.
  5. They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
  6. They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
  7. Administrators votes must be unanimous for adminship to be accepted.

Nominations

Mith (28/06/10)

Two week deadline from first request (12/07/10).

Support

  1. I believe that this Wiki needs more sysops, and I believe Mith meets and exceeds all of the requirements listed above. As we discussed in the last meeting, adminship should not be seen as a promotion, rather a responsibility; I'm confident Mith will be able to meet the needs of this responsibility.-- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  21:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral/comments

Nominee's acceptance