Tolkien Gateway

Tolkien Gateway:Requests for adminship/Archive

< Tolkien Gateway:Requests for adminship
Revision as of 19:06, 16 July 2010 by Mith (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page is an archive of Requests for adminship, please refrain from adding new adminship requests to this page.

Contents

[edit] Ederchil (8/5/08)

Two week deadline from first request

[edit] Support

  1. OK, Tolkien Gateway, the time has come. King Aragorn has made a good point about Hyarion's recent vacation, and I have always felt that there needed to be another admin on TG. If anything happened to Hy, TG would be crippled. I therefore nominate the first among the recent vacation triumvirate, Ederchil. He has shown himself worthy, an enforcer of TG standards, and a defender against outside disruptions. --Theoden1 21:40, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
  2. I agree, Hyarion is doing a great job, but if anything were to happen, I think Tolkien Gateway would be in good hands with Ederchil.--Quidon88 22:01, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
  3. I fully agree. --Þelma 04:49, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
  4. I certainly agree, for all reasons previously stated. Good luck!-- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  06:03, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
  5. If anyone can do it I personally agree that Ederchil is the person to do it.--User:High King Fingolfin/High King Fingolfin 23:10, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
  6. I agree, in the time I've been looking in here (and wanting to become much more active, but not finding the time for it), I have noticed Ederchil is always in evidence as keeping things in order somewhere. And must support my fellow countryman ;) -- Mithrennaith 22:01, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
  7. I agree, Ederchil has shown no signs of slowing down in activity and continues to contribute high quality content. Ederchil's opinions seem to always mirror my own and I see no reason why he wouldn't make a great administrator. Unsigned comment by Hyarion (talk • contribs). 21:02, 17 August 2008.

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral/comments

[edit] Nominee's acceptance

Of course. -- Ederchil 02:33, 7 August 2008 (EDT)


[edit] Mith (28/06/10)

Two week deadline from first request (12/07/10).

[edit] Support

  1. I believe that this Wiki needs more sysops, and I believe Mith meets and exceeds all of the requirements listed above. As we discussed in the last meeting, adminship should not be seen as a promotion, rather a responsibility; I'm confident Mith will be able to meet the needs of this responsibility.-- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  21:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  2. Ditto. Agree. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 21:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  3. Agree. --Morgan 21:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  4. Agree. — Mithrennaith 22:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  5. I agree --Amroth 14:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
  6. Agree -- Eldarion Telcontar 19:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral/comments

[edit] Nominee's acceptance

  • Of course. And thank you to all those who have nominated me so far. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)