Tolkien Gateway talk:Featured articles/Nominations: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
(Nom limits) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Nomination limits == | == Nomination limits == | ||
Let's try to hold the nominations down to 2 or 3 at a time. Hyarion wants to concentrate on bringing more articles up to standards, and I agree.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 16:17, 9 June 2008 (EDT) | Let's try to hold the nominations down to 2 or 3 at a time. Hyarion wants to concentrate on bringing more articles up to standards, and I agree.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 16:17, 9 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
== Criteria == | |||
I think we should come up with better criteria for nominating an article. Some people have mentioned pictures, references, and sources as necessary components - I'll agree. Yet saying we cannot use [[J.R.R. Tolkien|this article]] becuase it has no footnotes, when the [[Eriador|Featured Article]] doesn't have any cannot work out. Can we establish a formal list of criteria? --{{User:Breragor/sig}} 00:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:53, 2 March 2011
Nomination limits
Let's try to hold the nominations down to 2 or 3 at a time. Hyarion wants to concentrate on bringing more articles up to standards, and I agree.--Theoden1 16:17, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Criteria
I think we should come up with better criteria for nominating an article. Some people have mentioned pictures, references, and sources as necessary components - I'll agree. Yet saying we cannot use this article becuase it has no footnotes, when the Featured Article doesn't have any cannot work out. Can we establish a formal list of criteria? --Breragor • (Talk • Contribs • Edits) 00:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)