User talk:KingAragorn - Revision history

Jakegothicsnake at 04:39, 19 March 2013

2013-03-19T04:39:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 19 March 2013
Line 34:		Line 34:

	:Sure, we could change it. Do you have an alternative image in mind?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 09:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)		:Sure, we could change it. Do you have an alternative image in mind?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 09:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	Perhaps the Spider image by John Howe?

2013-03-18T09:41:32Z

Spiders profile image

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 18 March 2013
Line 31:		Line 31:
	== Spiders profile image ==		== Spiders profile image ==

−	Could we maybe change the profile and race image for the spiders?? I mean no offence by the artist's work or anything, but Ted Nasmith's spiders are far too frightening for me. Could we please maybe change the images to one that is not quite as nightmare inducing as the current one?	+	Could we maybe change the profile and race image for the spiders?? I mean no offence by the artist's work or anything, but Ted Nasmith's spiders are far too frightening for me. Could we please maybe change the images to one that is not quite as nightmare inducing as the current one? {{unsigned\|Jakegothicsnake}}
		+
		+	:Sure, we could change it. Do you have an alternative image in mind?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 09:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

2013-03-18T07:04:21Z

Spiders profile image: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:04, 18 March 2013
Line 28:		Line 28:

	::I prefer lowercase as well. For the same reason. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 22:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)		::I prefer lowercase as well. For the same reason. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 22:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Spiders profile image ==
		+
		+	Could we maybe change the profile and race image for the spiders?? I mean no offence by the artist's work or anything, but Ted Nasmith's spiders are far too frightening for me. Could we please maybe change the images to one that is not quite as nightmare inducing as the current one?

2013-03-02T22:45:04Z

References template: Also prefer lowercase

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 2 March 2013
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:It doesn't really matter. It's just a consistency thing.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)		:It doesn't really matter. It's just a consistency thing.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	::I prefer lowercase as well. For the same reason. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 22:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

2013-02-27T21:21:56Z

References template

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 27 February 2013
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Hello KA! I've noticed you write <nowiki>{{references}}</nowiki> with all lower-case letters; is there any technical reason why I shouldn't use <nowiki>{{References}}</nowiki>? --[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 21:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)		Hello KA! I've noticed you write <nowiki>{{references}}</nowiki> with all lower-case letters; is there any technical reason why I shouldn't use <nowiki>{{References}}</nowiki>? --[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 21:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	:It doesn't really matter. It's just a consistency thing.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

2013-02-27T21:18:29Z

References template: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 27 February 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:

	::Thanks. Hm, perhaps it's an archaic or obsolete usage ... I'll leave it at just "summons" in the wordlist.--[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 17:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC)		::Thanks. Hm, perhaps it's an archaic or obsolete usage ... I'll leave it at just "summons" in the wordlist.--[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 17:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	== References template ==
		+
		+	Hello KA! I've noticed you write <nowiki>{{references}}</nowiki> with all lower-case letters; is there any technical reason why I shouldn't use <nowiki>{{References}}</nowiki>? --[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 21:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

2013-02-14T17:07:42Z

English grammar

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 14 February 2013
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:Yes, it does sound odd. The only use of "summons" that I can think of is in relation to a court summons, but that wouldn't really explain it because that would still be a noun. Given that "to summons" appears twice in that footnote it seems intentional. There must be an explanation, but I can't think of one.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 22:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)		:Yes, it does sound odd. The only use of "summons" that I can think of is in relation to a court summons, but that wouldn't really explain it because that would still be a noun. Given that "to summons" appears twice in that footnote it seems intentional. There must be an explanation, but I can't think of one.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 22:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Thanks. Hm, perhaps it's an archaic or obsolete usage ... I'll leave it at just "summons" in the wordlist.--[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 17:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

2013-02-13T22:44:40Z

English grammar

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 13 February 2013
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==English grammar==		==English grammar==
	I need help on adding an English gloss to the wordlist. Tolkien writes that the meaing of T ''can-'' is "to summons or name a person" (PM:362). To my non-native ears, the verb "to summons" sounds strange -- I would write "to summon ...a person". Do you have an explanation? --[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 19:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)		I need help on adding an English gloss to the wordlist. Tolkien writes that the meaing of T ''can-'' is "to summons or name a person" (PM:362). To my non-native ears, the verb "to summons" sounds strange -- I would write "to summon ...a person". Do you have an explanation? --[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 19:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Yes, it does sound odd. The only use of "summons" that I can think of is in relation to a court summons, but that wouldn't really explain it because that would still be a noun. Given that "to summons" appears twice in that footnote it seems intentional. There must be an explanation, but I can't think of one.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 22:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

2013-02-13T19:28:19Z

English grammar

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 13 February 2013
Line 15:		Line 15:

	==English grammar==		==English grammar==
−	I need help on adding an English gloss to the wordlist. Tolkien writes that the meaing of S ''can-'' is "to summons or name a person" (PM:362). To my non-native ears, the verb "to summons" sounds strange -- I would write "to summon ...a person". Do you have an explanation? --[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 19:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)	+	I need help on adding an English gloss to the wordlist. Tolkien writes that the meaing of T ''can-'' is "to summons or name a person" (PM:362). To my non-native ears, the verb "to summons" sounds strange -- I would write "to summon ...a person". Do you have an explanation? --[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 19:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

2013-02-13T19:26:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 13 February 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:I would like that.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 09:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)		:I would like that.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 09:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	==English grammar==
		+	I need help on adding an English gloss to the wordlist. Tolkien writes that the meaing of S ''can-'' is "to summons or name a person" (PM:362). To my non-native ears, the verb "to summons" sounds strange -- I would write "to summon ...a person". Do you have an explanation? --[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 19:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)