<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://tolkiengateway.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=128.187.0.178</id>
	<title>Tolkien Gateway - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://tolkiengateway.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=128.187.0.178"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Special:Contributions/128.187.0.178"/>
	<updated>2026-06-29T06:35:52Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&amp;diff=66768</id>
		<title>Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&amp;diff=66768"/>
		<updated>2008-07-25T03:50:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;128.187.0.178: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Featured Articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any registered user can nominate an article for &#039;&#039;&#039;featured&#039;&#039;&#039; status.  It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced.  After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so.  Each entry should begin with &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;Disagree&#039;&#039;&#039; and be signed by the user.  One vote allowed per user, of course.  For the sake of practicality, let&#039;s limit active nominations to &#039;&#039;&#039;two articles&#039;&#039;&#039; at a time.  Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Glamdring]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I know it&#039;s scandalous, ego-pleasing self promotion, but I personally think my &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;preci...&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; Glamdring article would make a great Featured Article. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 16:13, 29 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. It is an impressive article for a weapon, with complete   information, both from inside and outside the imaginary world, which gives the reader a more complete image. Great references section! The pleasant writing style is on the plus side as well. ~~ [[User:Þelma|Þelma]] 15:55, 28 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. It is well cited. For that alone goes my vote. ~~ nikolet 03:33, 8 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.  I am astounded by this article&#039;s consistence and reference. Such excellence deserves to be featured.--[[User:Ingwe|Ingwe]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Gandalf]]==&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.  If I&#039;m not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t be again, but it&#039;s near the end of the queue. Oh, &#039;&#039;&#039;agree&#039;&#039;&#039;, btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.  This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated.  It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.   Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>128.187.0.178</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>