Tolkien Gateway - User contributions [en]

https://tolkiengateway.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Tolkienscholar91 Tolkien Gateway - User contributions [en] 2026-06-10T18:16:35Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.41.1 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Forums:Eru&diff=189268 Forums:Eru 2012-03-17T17:33:55Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: Created page with "<div style="background: #eee; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 5px">'''Tolkien Gateway &gt; Forums &gt; {{PAGENAME}}'''</div> Category:Council..."</p> <hr /> <div><div style="background: #eee; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 5px">'''[[Main Page|Tolkien Gateway]] &gt; [[Forum:Council|Forums]] &gt; {{PAGENAME}}'''</div> [[Category:Council]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Eru (Iluvatar) has only one eye. Check out The Sil. "More piercing than the Eye of Iluvatar." If Eru has two Tolkien being a philologist would have made it "eyes" don't you think?</div>

Tolkienscholar91 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&diff=141866 Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations 2011-01-24T19:12:01Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: /* Dwarves */</p> <hr /> <div>== Featured Articles ==<br /> <br /> Any registered user can nominate an article for '''featured''' status. It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced. After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so. Each entry should begin with '''Agree''' or '''Disagree''' and be signed by the user. One vote allowed per user, of course. For the sake of practicality, let's limit active nominations to '''two articles''' at a time. Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.<br /> <br /> ==[[Gandalf]]==<br /> It's a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. If I'm not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn't mean it can't be again, but it's near the end of the queue. Oh, '''agree''', btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated. It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe<br /> <br /> [[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--<tt><sup><font color="#7BA05B">[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]</font></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|<font color="#4B5320"><font size="5">53</font></font>]]</tt> 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien's work. His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf. --Yurpee<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. A central character in the LoTR trilogy. Everyone knows who he is and he deserves a good moment in the spotlight. -- Naruvir<br /> <br /> *'''Disagree''' - I think it's a big cluttered in its structure and severely lacks sources required to make it worthy of the title. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Gondor]]==<br /> [[Gondor]] would be a good choice. It's extensive, covers many bases, and has the requisite references. It should be next in line to be voted on for FA status.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 10:41, 28 July 2008 (EDT) <br /> <br /> :'''Undecided''' - although well-written, I think it needs to be better referenced as we should only show off the ''very best'' articles that TG has to offer. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Eriador]]==<br /> Don't need to say much about [[Eriador]], perfect example of good article. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Because it's just so awesome. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Contains all that's important. Very well referenced. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 21:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - As I wrote it! --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Dwarves]]==<br /> I think they're not given enough credit nor enough recognition - they're the most overshadowed of the major races in Tolkien's legendarium.<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' - I don't know if the banner at the top of the article matters, so if not it has my full support. Otherwise I vote for another Dwarves-related article. -- [[User:Breragor|Breragor]]<br /> *'''Undecided''' - As an article it needs some work, as is clear with the <nowiki>{{sources}}</nowiki> template at the top. However I agree that as a race they are often overlooked. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 03:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Disagree''' - A complete lack of sources, the structure is a bit haphazard and it contains a few too many redlinks and spelling errors for my liking. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 12:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - I have been personally working on compiling all the information I can find on Dwarves in Tolkiens books, even if it conflicts with itself. Once it is compiled for my personal use I will copy it to this website. --<br /> TolkienScholar91 11:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)</div>

Tolkienscholar91 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&diff=141865 Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations 2011-01-24T19:09:38Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: /* Dwarves */</p> <hr /> <div>== Featured Articles ==<br /> <br /> Any registered user can nominate an article for '''featured''' status. It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced. After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so. Each entry should begin with '''Agree''' or '''Disagree''' and be signed by the user. One vote allowed per user, of course. For the sake of practicality, let's limit active nominations to '''two articles''' at a time. Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.<br /> <br /> ==[[Gandalf]]==<br /> It's a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. If I'm not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn't mean it can't be again, but it's near the end of the queue. Oh, '''agree''', btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated. It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe<br /> <br /> [[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--<tt><sup><font color="#7BA05B">[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]</font></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|<font color="#4B5320"><font size="5">53</font></font>]]</tt> 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien's work. His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf. --Yurpee<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. A central character in the LoTR trilogy. Everyone knows who he is and he deserves a good moment in the spotlight. -- Naruvir<br /> <br /> *'''Disagree''' - I think it's a big cluttered in its structure and severely lacks sources required to make it worthy of the title. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Gondor]]==<br /> [[Gondor]] would be a good choice. It's extensive, covers many bases, and has the requisite references. It should be next in line to be voted on for FA status.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 10:41, 28 July 2008 (EDT) <br /> <br /> :'''Undecided''' - although well-written, I think it needs to be better referenced as we should only show off the ''very best'' articles that TG has to offer. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Eriador]]==<br /> Don't need to say much about [[Eriador]], perfect example of good article. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Because it's just so awesome. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Contains all that's important. Very well referenced. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 21:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - As I wrote it! --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Dwarves]]==<br /> I think they're not given enough credit nor enough recognition - they're the most overshadowed of the major races in Tolkien's legendarium.<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' - I don't know if the banner at the top of the article matters, so if not it has my full support. Otherwise I vote for another Dwarves-related article. -- [[User:Breragor|Breragor]]<br /> *'''Undecided''' - As an article it needs some work, as is clear with the <nowiki>{{sources}}</nowiki> template at the top. However I agree that as a race they are often overlooked. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 03:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Disagree''' - A complete lack of sources, the structure is a bit haphazard and it contains a few too many redlinks and spelling errors for my liking. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 12:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - I have been personally working on compiling all the information I can find on Dwarves in Tolkiens books, even if it conflicts with itself. Once it is compiled for my personal use I will copy it to this website. --<br /> {{User:TolkienScholar91/sig}} 11:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)</div>

Tolkienscholar91 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&diff=141863 Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations 2011-01-24T19:05:23Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: /* Dwarves */</p> <hr /> <div>== Featured Articles ==<br /> <br /> Any registered user can nominate an article for '''featured''' status. It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced. After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so. Each entry should begin with '''Agree''' or '''Disagree''' and be signed by the user. One vote allowed per user, of course. For the sake of practicality, let's limit active nominations to '''two articles''' at a time. Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.<br /> <br /> ==[[Gandalf]]==<br /> It's a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. If I'm not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn't mean it can't be again, but it's near the end of the queue. Oh, '''agree''', btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated. It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe<br /> <br /> [[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--<tt><sup><font color="#7BA05B">[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]</font></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|<font color="#4B5320"><font size="5">53</font></font>]]</tt> 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien's work. His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf. --Yurpee<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. A central character in the LoTR trilogy. Everyone knows who he is and he deserves a good moment in the spotlight. -- Naruvir<br /> <br /> *'''Disagree''' - I think it's a big cluttered in its structure and severely lacks sources required to make it worthy of the title. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Gondor]]==<br /> [[Gondor]] would be a good choice. It's extensive, covers many bases, and has the requisite references. It should be next in line to be voted on for FA status.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 10:41, 28 July 2008 (EDT) <br /> <br /> :'''Undecided''' - although well-written, I think it needs to be better referenced as we should only show off the ''very best'' articles that TG has to offer. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Eriador]]==<br /> Don't need to say much about [[Eriador]], perfect example of good article. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Because it's just so awesome. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Contains all that's important. Very well referenced. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 21:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - As I wrote it! --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Dwarves]]==<br /> I think they're not given enough credit nor enough recognition - they're the most overshadowed of the major races in Tolkien's legendarium.<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' - I don't know if the banner at the top of the article matters, so if not it has my full support. Otherwise I vote for another Dwarves-related article. -- [[User:Breragor|Breragor]]<br /> *'''Undecided''' - As an article it needs some work, as is clear with the <nowiki>{{sources}}</nowiki> template at the top. However I agree that as a race they are often overlooked. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 03:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Disagree''' - A complete lack of sources, the structure is a bit haphazard and it contains a few too many redlinks and spelling errors for my liking. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 12:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - I have been personally working on compiling all the information I can find on Dwarves in Tolkiens books, even if it conflicts with itself. Once it is compiled for my personal use I will copy it to this website.<br /> <a href="http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/User:Tolkienscholar91">Tolkienscholar91</a></div>

Tolkienscholar91 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&diff=141862 Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations 2011-01-24T19:02:43Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: /* Dwarves */</p> <hr /> <div>== Featured Articles ==<br /> <br /> Any registered user can nominate an article for '''featured''' status. It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced. After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so. Each entry should begin with '''Agree''' or '''Disagree''' and be signed by the user. One vote allowed per user, of course. For the sake of practicality, let's limit active nominations to '''two articles''' at a time. Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.<br /> <br /> ==[[Gandalf]]==<br /> It's a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. If I'm not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn't mean it can't be again, but it's near the end of the queue. Oh, '''agree''', btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated. It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe<br /> <br /> [[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--<tt><sup><font color="#7BA05B">[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]</font></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|<font color="#4B5320"><font size="5">53</font></font>]]</tt> 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien's work. His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf. --Yurpee<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. A central character in the LoTR trilogy. Everyone knows who he is and he deserves a good moment in the spotlight. -- Naruvir<br /> <br /> *'''Disagree''' - I think it's a big cluttered in its structure and severely lacks sources required to make it worthy of the title. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Gondor]]==<br /> [[Gondor]] would be a good choice. It's extensive, covers many bases, and has the requisite references. It should be next in line to be voted on for FA status.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 10:41, 28 July 2008 (EDT) <br /> <br /> :'''Undecided''' - although well-written, I think it needs to be better referenced as we should only show off the ''very best'' articles that TG has to offer. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Eriador]]==<br /> Don't need to say much about [[Eriador]], perfect example of good article. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Because it's just so awesome. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Contains all that's important. Very well referenced. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 21:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - As I wrote it! --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Dwarves]]==<br /> I think they're not given enough credit nor enough recognition - they're the most overshadowed of the major races in Tolkien's legendarium.<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' - I don't know if the banner at the top of the article matters, so if not it has my full support. Otherwise I vote for another Dwarves-related article. -- [[User:Breragor|Breragor]]<br /> *'''Undecided''' - As an article it needs some work, as is clear with the <nowiki>{{sources}}</nowiki> template at the top. However I agree that as a race they are often overlooked. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 03:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Disagree''' - A complete lack of sources, the structure is a bit haphazard and it contains a few too many redlinks and spelling errors for my liking. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 12:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - I have been personally working on compiling all the information I can find on Dwarves in Tolkiens books, even if it conflicts with itself. Once it is compiled for my personal use I will copy it to this website.<br /> http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/User:Tolkienscholar91</div>

Tolkienscholar91 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&diff=141861 Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations 2011-01-24T19:01:49Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: /* Dwarves */</p> <hr /> <div>== Featured Articles ==<br /> <br /> Any registered user can nominate an article for '''featured''' status. It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced. After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so. Each entry should begin with '''Agree''' or '''Disagree''' and be signed by the user. One vote allowed per user, of course. For the sake of practicality, let's limit active nominations to '''two articles''' at a time. Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.<br /> <br /> ==[[Gandalf]]==<br /> It's a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. If I'm not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn't mean it can't be again, but it's near the end of the queue. Oh, '''agree''', btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated. It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe<br /> <br /> [[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--<tt><sup><font color="#7BA05B">[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]</font></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|<font color="#4B5320"><font size="5">53</font></font>]]</tt> 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien's work. His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf. --Yurpee<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. A central character in the LoTR trilogy. Everyone knows who he is and he deserves a good moment in the spotlight. -- Naruvir<br /> <br /> *'''Disagree''' - I think it's a big cluttered in its structure and severely lacks sources required to make it worthy of the title. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Gondor]]==<br /> [[Gondor]] would be a good choice. It's extensive, covers many bases, and has the requisite references. It should be next in line to be voted on for FA status.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 10:41, 28 July 2008 (EDT) <br /> <br /> :'''Undecided''' - although well-written, I think it needs to be better referenced as we should only show off the ''very best'' articles that TG has to offer. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Eriador]]==<br /> Don't need to say much about [[Eriador]], perfect example of good article. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Because it's just so awesome. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Contains all that's important. Very well referenced. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 21:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - As I wrote it! --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Dwarves]]==<br /> I think they're not given enough credit nor enough recognition - they're the most overshadowed of the major races in Tolkien's legendarium.<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' - I don't know if the banner at the top of the article matters, so if not it has my full support. Otherwise I vote for another Dwarves-related article. -- [[User:Breragor|Breragor]]<br /> *'''Undecided''' - As an article it needs some work, as is clear with the <nowiki>{{sources}}</nowiki> template at the top. However I agree that as a race they are often overlooked. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 03:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Disagree''' - A complete lack of sources, the structure is a bit haphazard and it contains a few too many redlinks and spelling errors for my liking. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 12:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - I have been personally working on compiling all the information I can find on Dwarves in Tolkiens books, even if it conflicts with itself. Once it is compiled for my personal use I will copy it to this website.-- {{User:Tolkienscholar/sig}} 11:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)</div>

Tolkienscholar91 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&diff=141860 Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations 2011-01-24T18:59:44Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: /* Dwarves */</p> <hr /> <div>== Featured Articles ==<br /> <br /> Any registered user can nominate an article for '''featured''' status. It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced. After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so. Each entry should begin with '''Agree''' or '''Disagree''' and be signed by the user. One vote allowed per user, of course. For the sake of practicality, let's limit active nominations to '''two articles''' at a time. Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.<br /> <br /> ==[[Gandalf]]==<br /> It's a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. If I'm not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn't mean it can't be again, but it's near the end of the queue. Oh, '''agree''', btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated. It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe<br /> <br /> [[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--<tt><sup><font color="#7BA05B">[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]</font></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|<font color="#4B5320"><font size="5">53</font></font>]]</tt> 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien's work. His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf. --Yurpee<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. A central character in the LoTR trilogy. Everyone knows who he is and he deserves a good moment in the spotlight. -- Naruvir<br /> <br /> *'''Disagree''' - I think it's a big cluttered in its structure and severely lacks sources required to make it worthy of the title. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Gondor]]==<br /> [[Gondor]] would be a good choice. It's extensive, covers many bases, and has the requisite references. It should be next in line to be voted on for FA status.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 10:41, 28 July 2008 (EDT) <br /> <br /> :'''Undecided''' - although well-written, I think it needs to be better referenced as we should only show off the ''very best'' articles that TG has to offer. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Eriador]]==<br /> Don't need to say much about [[Eriador]], perfect example of good article. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Because it's just so awesome. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Contains all that's important. Very well referenced. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 21:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - As I wrote it! --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Dwarves]]==<br /> I think they're not given enough credit nor enough recognition - they're the most overshadowed of the major races in Tolkien's legendarium.<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' - I don't know if the banner at the top of the article matters, so if not it has my full support. Otherwise I vote for another Dwarves-related article. -- [[User:Breragor|Breragor]]<br /> *'''Undecided''' - As an article it needs some work, as is clear with the <nowiki>{{sources}}</nowiki> template at the top. However I agree that as a race they are often overlooked. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 03:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Disagree''' - A complete lack of sources, the structure is a bit haphazard and it contains a few too many redlinks and spelling errors for my liking. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 12:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - I have been personally working on compiling all the information I can find on Dwarves in Tolkiens books, even if it conflicts with itself. Once it is compiled for my personal use I will copy it to this website. Tolkienscholar</div>

Tolkienscholar91 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&diff=141859 Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations 2011-01-24T18:59:18Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: /* Dwarves */</p> <hr /> <div>== Featured Articles ==<br /> <br /> Any registered user can nominate an article for '''featured''' status. It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced. After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so. Each entry should begin with '''Agree''' or '''Disagree''' and be signed by the user. One vote allowed per user, of course. For the sake of practicality, let's limit active nominations to '''two articles''' at a time. Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.<br /> <br /> ==[[Gandalf]]==<br /> It's a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. If I'm not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn't mean it can't be again, but it's near the end of the queue. Oh, '''agree''', btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated. It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe<br /> <br /> [[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--<tt><sup><font color="#7BA05B">[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]</font></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|<font color="#4B5320"><font size="5">53</font></font>]]</tt> 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien's work. His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf. --Yurpee<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. A central character in the LoTR trilogy. Everyone knows who he is and he deserves a good moment in the spotlight. -- Naruvir<br /> <br /> *'''Disagree''' - I think it's a big cluttered in its structure and severely lacks sources required to make it worthy of the title. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Gondor]]==<br /> [[Gondor]] would be a good choice. It's extensive, covers many bases, and has the requisite references. It should be next in line to be voted on for FA status.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 10:41, 28 July 2008 (EDT) <br /> <br /> :'''Undecided''' - although well-written, I think it needs to be better referenced as we should only show off the ''very best'' articles that TG has to offer. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Eriador]]==<br /> Don't need to say much about [[Eriador]], perfect example of good article. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Because it's just so awesome. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Contains all that's important. Very well referenced. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 21:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - As I wrote it! --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Dwarves]]==<br /> I think they're not given enough credit nor enough recognition - they're the most overshadowed of the major races in Tolkien's legendarium.<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' - I don't know if the banner at the top of the article matters, so if not it has my full support. Otherwise I vote for another Dwarves-related article. -- [[User:Breragor|Breragor]]<br /> *'''Undecided''' - As an article it needs some work, as is clear with the <nowiki>{{sources}}</nowiki> template at the top. However I agree that as a race they are often overlooked. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 03:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Disagree''' - A complete lack of sources, the structure is a bit haphazard and it contains a few too many redlinks and spelling errors for my liking. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 12:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - I have been personally working on compiling all the information I can find on Dwarves in Tolkiens books, even if it conflicts with itself. Once it is compiled for my personal use I will copy it to this website. --{{User:Tolkienscholar/sig}}</div>

Tolkienscholar91 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&diff=141858 Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations 2011-01-24T18:56:54Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: /* Dwarves */</p> <hr /> <div>== Featured Articles ==<br /> <br /> Any registered user can nominate an article for '''featured''' status. It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced. After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so. Each entry should begin with '''Agree''' or '''Disagree''' and be signed by the user. One vote allowed per user, of course. For the sake of practicality, let's limit active nominations to '''two articles''' at a time. Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.<br /> <br /> ==[[Gandalf]]==<br /> It's a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. If I'm not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn't mean it can't be again, but it's near the end of the queue. Oh, '''agree''', btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated. It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe<br /> <br /> [[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]<br /> <br /> * '''Agree'''. Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--<tt><sup><font color="#7BA05B">[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]</font></sup>[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|<font color="#4B5320"><font size="5">53</font></font>]]</tt> 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien's work. His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf. --Yurpee<br /> <br /> *'''Agree'''. A central character in the LoTR trilogy. Everyone knows who he is and he deserves a good moment in the spotlight. -- Naruvir<br /> <br /> *'''Disagree''' - I think it's a big cluttered in its structure and severely lacks sources required to make it worthy of the title. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Gondor]]==<br /> [[Gondor]] would be a good choice. It's extensive, covers many bases, and has the requisite references. It should be next in line to be voted on for FA status.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 10:41, 28 July 2008 (EDT) <br /> <br /> :'''Undecided''' - although well-written, I think it needs to be better referenced as we should only show off the ''very best'' articles that TG has to offer. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Eriador]]==<br /> Don't need to say much about [[Eriador]], perfect example of good article. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Because it's just so awesome. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - Contains all that's important. Very well referenced. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 21:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - As I wrote it! --{{User:Mith/sig}} 14:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ==[[Dwarves]]==<br /> I think they're not given enough credit nor enough recognition - they're the most overshadowed of the major races in Tolkien's legendarium.<br /> <br /> *'''Agree''' - I don't know if the banner at the top of the article matters, so if not it has my full support. Otherwise I vote for another Dwarves-related article. -- [[User:Breragor|Breragor]]<br /> *'''Undecided''' - As an article it needs some work, as is clear with the <nowiki>{{sources}}</nowiki> template at the top. However I agree that as a race they are often overlooked. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 03:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Disagree''' - A complete lack of sources, the structure is a bit haphazard and it contains a few too many redlinks and spelling errors for my liking. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 12:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)<br /> *'''Agree''' - I have been personally working on compiling all the information I can find on Dwarves in Tolkiens books, even if it conflicts with itself. Once it is compiled for my personal use I will copy it to this website.</div>

Tolkienscholar91 https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tolkienscholar91&diff=141579 User talk:Tolkienscholar91 2011-01-18T05:11:47Z

<p>Tolkienscholar91: Adding welcome message to new user's talk page</p> <hr /> <div>{{MediaWiki:NewUserMessage|Tolkienscholar91}}</div>

Tolkienscholar91