<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://tolkiengateway.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Yurpee</id>
	<title>Tolkien Gateway - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://tolkiengateway.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Yurpee"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Special:Contributions/Yurpee"/>
	<updated>2026-06-09T17:41:48Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&amp;diff=87403</id>
		<title>Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&amp;diff=87403"/>
		<updated>2009-11-16T14:31:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yurpee: /* Gandalf */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Featured Articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any registered user can nominate an article for &#039;&#039;&#039;featured&#039;&#039;&#039; status.  It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced.  After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so.  Each entry should begin with &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;Disagree&#039;&#039;&#039; and be signed by the user.  One vote allowed per user, of course.  For the sake of practicality, let&#039;s limit active nominations to &#039;&#039;&#039;two articles&#039;&#039;&#039; at a time.  Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Glamdring]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I know it&#039;s scandalous, ego-pleasing self promotion, but I personally think my &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;preci...&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; Glamdring article would make a great Featured Article. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 16:13, 29 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. It is an impressive article for a weapon, with complete   information, both from inside and outside the imaginary world, which gives the reader a more complete image. Great references section! The pleasant writing style is on the plus side as well. ~~ [[User:Þelma|Þelma]] 15:55, 28 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. It is well cited. For that alone goes my vote. ~~ nikolet 03:33, 8 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. I am astounded by this article&#039;s consistence and reference. Such excellence deserves to be featured.--[[User:Ingwe|Ingwe]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. Great article presenting all the facts and assumptions about the sword. A very thorough and nevertheless entertaining article. --[[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 18:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Gandalf]]==&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.  If I&#039;m not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t be again, but it&#039;s near the end of the queue. Oh, &#039;&#039;&#039;agree&#039;&#039;&#039;, btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.  This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated.  It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.   Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.  Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039; A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#7BA05B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#4B5320&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font size=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;53&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien&#039;s work.  His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf. --Yurpee&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yurpee</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&amp;diff=87402</id>
		<title>Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Nominations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Tolkien_Gateway:Featured_articles/Nominations&amp;diff=87402"/>
		<updated>2009-11-16T14:30:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yurpee: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Featured Articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any registered user can nominate an article for &#039;&#039;&#039;featured&#039;&#039;&#039; status.  It should be well-written, complete, illustrated, and referenced.  After nomination, an article should receive five votes with with no objections within a month or so.  Each entry should begin with &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;Disagree&#039;&#039;&#039; and be signed by the user.  One vote allowed per user, of course.  For the sake of practicality, let&#039;s limit active nominations to &#039;&#039;&#039;two articles&#039;&#039;&#039; at a time.  Further nominations should be held in the queue, in reserve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Glamdring]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I know it&#039;s scandalous, ego-pleasing self promotion, but I personally think my &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;preci...&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; Glamdring article would make a great Featured Article. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 16:13, 29 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. It is an impressive article for a weapon, with complete   information, both from inside and outside the imaginary world, which gives the reader a more complete image. Great references section! The pleasant writing style is on the plus side as well. ~~ [[User:Þelma|Þelma]] 15:55, 28 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. It is well cited. For that alone goes my vote. ~~ nikolet 03:33, 8 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. I am astounded by this article&#039;s consistence and reference. Such excellence deserves to be featured.--[[User:Ingwe|Ingwe]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. Great article presenting all the facts and assumptions about the sword. A very thorough and nevertheless entertaining article. --[[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 18:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Gandalf]]==&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s a pretty impressive article, and well deserved for my favourite character and such an interesting character.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 07:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.  If I&#039;m not mistaking, Gandalf has already been FA once. That doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t be again, but it&#039;s near the end of the queue. Oh, &#039;&#039;&#039;agree&#039;&#039;&#039;, btw. but the sourcing needs to be a bit better. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 08:01, 6 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.  This article is extensive, appears complete, well-referenced, and lavishly illustrated.  It is a prime example of what an FA should be.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 13:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.   Yes, quite well done. Excellent, in fact.--Ingwe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured Article Nominations|Featured Article Nominations]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;.  Nice long article, good information, plus good introduction into Tolkien. {{unsigned|ZehnWaters}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039; A Middle Earth without Gandalf, is not a true Middle Eearth at all.--{{User:Breragor/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. After reading it, I have to admit it is the best article we have.--&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#7BA05B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Odysseas-spartan-53|Odysseas]]-[[User talk:Odysseas-spartan-53|Spartan]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/Odysseas-spartan-53|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#4B5320&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font size=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;53&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; 10:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. Exellent Article! Besides, Gandalf is the heart of Tolkien&#039;s work.  His article deserves to be featured. [[User:Mthomas|mthomas]] 12:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Agree&#039;&#039;&#039;. The first thing new users see is the main page, and generally people are most familiar with Gandalf.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yurpee</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Forums:This_site_still_alive_no_news,_witch_king_has_been_the_featured_for_a_year_now&amp;diff=87401</id>
		<title>Forums:This site still alive no news, witch king has been the featured for a year now</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=Forums:This_site_still_alive_no_news,_witch_king_has_been_the_featured_for_a_year_now&amp;diff=87401"/>
		<updated>2009-11-16T14:18:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yurpee: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;background: #eee; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 5px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Main Page|Tolkien Gateway]] &amp;amp;gt; [[Forum:Council|Council]] &amp;amp;gt; {{PAGENAME}}&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; [[Category:Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Start writing after this line --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to heading {{unsigned|60.224.33.205}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The front-page could probably use a makeover, but the rest of the site has changed immensely over the past year. We&#039;re now averaging nearly two thousand unique visitors every single day thanks to all the hard working editors like [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] and [[User:Sage|Sage]]. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 03:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for the credit. Personally I don&#039;t use the main page since I directly go to the &amp;quot;recent articles&amp;quot; or my watchlist list, and I guess other regular editors do so too. [[User:Sage|Sage]] 08:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Me too; though I hardly do anything of late (touchups and janitorial mostly). I&#039;ve been dividing my time between this wiki and the DCAU and DC wikia&#039;s (dividing meaning they get slightly more time). Hyar, now that you back, can you solve the image problem? -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 11:17, 11 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It may be that we rather use sites like the watchlist or &amp;quot;recent articles&amp;quot; but what visitors see first is the main page. The &amp;quot;On this day...&amp;quot; section is great and we don&#039;t need &amp;quot;Updates&amp;quot; every month but the contents of &amp;quot;Featured Article&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Collaborations&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Featured Quote&amp;quot; are ancient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Featured Article&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::::We have 2 nominated articles: &#039;&#039;&#039;Gandalf&#039;&#039;&#039; with seven Agrees and &#039;&#039;&#039;Glamdring&#039;&#039;&#039; with three. &#039;&#039;&#039;Gandalf&#039;&#039;&#039; lacks some sources so maybe we could take Glamdring first (if Ederchil and Sage added their Agree we would have the needed 5 - in fact I haven&#039;t voted either...). Ederchil, would you put Glamdring on the Main Page (I could write the short text needed..). It would be great to see a change there... :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Featured Quote&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::::We have already five Agrees for the &amp;quot;Elrond-Gimli exchange&amp;quot;. Why don&#039;t put it on the Main Page?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Collaborations&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::::We could take one of the articles needing expansion. I would suggest [[Barad-dûr]]?! Perhaps we should change &amp;quot;The improvement drive article for this week is:&amp;quot; into &amp;quot;The improvement drive article is:&amp;quot;. It&#039;s a bit strange to read &amp;quot;for this week&amp;quot; and see it unchanged for months. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 20:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Went ahead and changed the quote and collab. I don&#039;t vote for Glamdring because I wrote it. (and, I&#039;m ashamed to say, nominated it.) -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 21:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Voted for Glamdring (really great article). One last Agree needed and we could have a new Featured Article after seven months. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 21:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thank you for the responses, i just really like the article of the day idea. Maybe we could change it 2 article of the month?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yurpee</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yurpee&amp;diff=82276</id>
		<title>User talk:Yurpee</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://tolkiengateway.net/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yurpee&amp;diff=82276"/>
		<updated>2009-05-11T11:27:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yurpee: Adding welcome message to new user&amp;#039;s talk page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{MediaWiki:NewUserMessage|Yurpee}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yurpee</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>