Forums:Genealogy: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary |
(revert vandalism) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="background: #eee; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 5px">'''[[Main Page|Tolkien Gateway]] | <div style="background: #eee; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 5px">'''[[Main Page|Tolkien Gateway]] > [[Forum:Council|Council]] > {{PAGENAME}}'''</div> [[Category:Council]] | ||
<!-- Start writing after this line --> | |||
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to change the genealogies to the graphic design that they have at Wikipedia. I personaly think that looks better than ASCII, but it might not be such a great idea because I don't want to delete peoples' hard work. | |||
:You know, I have the ability to create genealogies in graphics. If that is what everyone wants. --[[User:Narfil Palùrfalas|Narfil Palùrfalas]] 18:28, 30 January 2007 (EST) | |||
::When we upgrade the wiki engine we'll have the ability to create fancier genealogies, we probably want to make sure the genealogies stay "editable" and are not static images, though I suppose it's not like the trees will change. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 19:49, 30 January 2007 (EST) | |||
:::Yeah, but what if someone feels more information could be included which hasn't. Or an error's been made, etc. etc. I think editable ones are better, but I agree they should be more pleasant to look at. — [[User:Mith|Mith]] 07:27, 31 January 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 09:06, 4 July 2007
Tolkien Gateway > Council > Genealogy
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to change the genealogies to the graphic design that they have at Wikipedia. I personaly think that looks better than ASCII, but it might not be such a great idea because I don't want to delete peoples' hard work.
- You know, I have the ability to create genealogies in graphics. If that is what everyone wants. --Narfil Palùrfalas 18:28, 30 January 2007 (EST)
- When we upgrade the wiki engine we'll have the ability to create fancier genealogies, we probably want to make sure the genealogies stay "editable" and are not static images, though I suppose it's not like the trees will change. --Hyarion 19:49, 30 January 2007 (EST)
- Yeah, but what if someone feels more information could be included which hasn't. Or an error's been made, etc. etc. I think editable ones are better, but I agree they should be more pleasant to look at. — Mith 07:27, 31 January 2007 (EST)
