From Tolkien Gateway
Revision as of 20:46, 19 October 2022 by Dour1234 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hello to everyone.Should the pages Amazon and Incorporated exist here on Tolkien Gateway and why?I mean if yes why and if not why again?

Γιάννης Ευαγγελίου (talk)

If you do not think that they should exist, then why create them in the first place? For my part, I believe that if they stay, then they should stay and if they should be deleted, then they should be deleted. It is up to you since you created them. Dour1234 (talk) 21:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Oh, I didn't see this. Yes, please, stop creating so many articles. One article for Amazon stuff is enough. --LorenzoCB (talk) 21:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I've always considered Tolkien Gateway to be more accurate and more focused on Tolkien's work than the other prominent wiki, and always appreciated that it did not use images from the movies. This is about Tolkien's work, I don't see why characters invented by other people should have the prominence of their own pages. If people truly want in-depth information about those characters they can go to the other wiki. So I think they should be deleted, and stay deleted. A brief synopsis of the character on a Rings of Power page is more than sufficient.: - Anonymous (19th October 2022)
I don't understand why giving space to adaptations of Tolkien's works may affect the wiki's accuracy. These articles are but crumbs compared to the rest, and they are given much less importance. But I agree we could simplify things a little, like creating lists of original locations and characters, as we do with LOTRO. --LorenzoCB (talk) 16:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
I do not see why we need to simplify things related to adaptations. Though I do not believe that we should provide a list of locations in LOTRO since LOTRO has its own wiki. Other adaptations do not their own wiki.Dour1234 (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC)