Talk:Eriol: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 13 June 2011 by Amroth
mNo edit summary |
(adding reply) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::The question on how to categorize is difficult, I don't have any anwer at the moment. The basic problem is that characters (or other concepts) which don't belong in the legendarium end up in subcategories under Category:Eä, which is wrong.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 13:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC) | ::The question on how to categorize is difficult, I don't have any anwer at the moment. The basic problem is that characters (or other concepts) which don't belong in the legendarium end up in subcategories under Category:Eä, which is wrong.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 13:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::Yes. I placed it in [[:Category:Noncanon Men|Noncanon Men]], but I'm not sure if that was the best option. Since that page only includes characters from adaptations and was specificaly made for men from adaptations. --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 13:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:59, 13 June 2011
Discussion on Eriol/Aelfwine at lotrplaza.--Morgan 13:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Looks like a good external link, feel free to add anything to this article. Just made it in a short time, so it's everything except complete.
- Also, should we make a category for characters from TBLOT, or for HoME in general? --Amroth 13:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- The question on how to categorize is difficult, I don't have any anwer at the moment. The basic problem is that characters (or other concepts) which don't belong in the legendarium end up in subcategories under Category:Eä, which is wrong.--Morgan 13:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. I placed it in Noncanon Men, but I'm not sure if that was the best option. Since that page only includes characters from adaptations and was specificaly made for men from adaptations. --Amroth 13:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
