Talk:Gondor: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
(reply)
(Additions)
Line 4: Line 4:


:I've added "Languages" and improved "Etymology". However, there is room for more. Currently, the article is mostly history. Should this article include sections like "Law" and "Customs", or does that belong on [[Gondorians]]? -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 03:36, 28 July 2008 (EDT)
:I've added "Languages" and improved "Etymology". However, there is room for more. Currently, the article is mostly history. Should this article include sections like "Law" and "Customs", or does that belong on [[Gondorians]]? -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 03:36, 28 July 2008 (EDT)
:Excellent-- it's now worthy of nomination.  The additional section should be put here.  Plus, [[Gondorians]] is only a stub at present.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 10:37, 28 July 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:37, 28 July 2008

FA Status

This article has most of the qualities required to be nominated for Featured Article status. It's pretty well written, stable, and is well-illustrated. The one thing it lacks is references. Let's get them put in, and add to the nomination queue. I'll help.--Theoden1 19:20, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I've added "Languages" and improved "Etymology". However, there is room for more. Currently, the article is mostly history. Should this article include sections like "Law" and "Customs", or does that belong on Gondorians? -- Ederchil 03:36, 28 July 2008 (EDT)
Excellent-- it's now worthy of nomination. The additional section should be put here. Plus, Gondorians is only a stub at present.--Theoden1 10:37, 28 July 2008 (EDT)