Talk:Last prince of Cardolan: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 12 June 2021 by Tolkienator in topic Why...?
No edit summary |
Tolkienator (talk | contribs) (→Why...?: Should be deleted) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I think we can keep it, the wiki has no problem with unnamed topics. But the article needs to be cleaned up to be more focused on the character. Idk if the author saw this or not, but he looks quite rude including a dozillion links after the deletion was proposed. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 17:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC) | :I think we can keep it, the wiki has no problem with unnamed topics. But the article needs to be cleaned up to be more focused on the character. Idk if the author saw this or not, but he looks quite rude including a dozillion links after the deletion was proposed. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 17:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
::I think it should be deleted. There is no confirmation of a kingship in Cardolan, no less the ambiguity of a prince in Cardolan. With all the relevant information about this character existing in the Angmar War article, this page should be swiftly deleted. Not to mention the heavy speculation in the "Mentions" and "Family" sub-sections of the article.--[[User:Tolkienator|Tolkienator]] 03:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:51, 12 June 2021
Why...?
This character is only mentioned once in the legendarium and doesn't even have a name. It doesn't hold any value on its own as all the important info on this page is already mentioned in the "Angmar War" page. I propose a quick move to deletion.--Tolkienator 12:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with the reasons for deletion that were already provided by Tolkienator. This page should be deleted. The little information that is known about the last prince of Cardolan and the dream in the barrow in the barrow Downs is already or can be included in existing pages. --Akhorahil 14:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. --Ancalagon the Black 15:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- I think we can keep it, the wiki has no problem with unnamed topics. But the article needs to be cleaned up to be more focused on the character. Idk if the author saw this or not, but he looks quite rude including a dozillion links after the deletion was proposed. --LorenzoCB 17:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- I think it should be deleted. There is no confirmation of a kingship in Cardolan, no less the ambiguity of a prince in Cardolan. With all the relevant information about this character existing in the Angmar War article, this page should be swiftly deleted. Not to mention the heavy speculation in the "Mentions" and "Family" sub-sections of the article.--Tolkienator 03:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
