Talk:Middle-earth: The Wizards: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 4 April 2010 by Morgan
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Changed it to something I think is prettier. -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 22:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | :::Changed it to something I think is prettier. -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 22:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Edit: Maybe a general, bit more wordy section on [[Middle-earth Collectible Card Game|the main article]] can be linked to instead, because it currently does not explain much either. -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 22:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | :::Edit: Maybe a general, bit more wordy section on [[Middle-earth Collectible Card Game|the main article]] can be linked to instead, because it currently does not explain much either. -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 22:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::I think your first solution looked nice, but I'll try to write something simple on the MECCG page (and hope some MECCG aficionado corrects me in the future if it's wrong!).--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 22:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:31, 4 April 2010
This is a test of what a more detailed presenation of MECCG could look like (see also METW: Aragorn II). Please let me know any suggestions! --Morgan 20:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Looks good. Though I think the "Rarity: Fixed1" needs some explaining. People unfamiliar with card games (such as myself) don't have a clue how rare that is. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 21:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Is the new change enough (pointing back to the code description on the set page)? I agree that the rarity codes are a bit complex! --Morgan 22:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Changed it to something I think is prettier. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Edit: Maybe a general, bit more wordy section on the main article can be linked to instead, because it currently does not explain much either. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- I think your first solution looked nice, but I'll try to write something simple on the MECCG page (and hope some MECCG aficionado corrects me in the future if it's wrong!).--Morgan 22:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
