Talk:The Mythology of Middle-earth: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Earendilyon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(I confess) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Quote: ''It is, like its successor, neither scholarly nor very deep.'' Shouldn't we try to keep our articles as objective as possible? ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 16:20, 23 January 2008 (EST) | Quote: ''It is, like its successor, neither scholarly nor very deep.'' Shouldn't we try to keep our articles as objective as possible? ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 16:20, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
:Guilty as charged. I don't really like Noel. I couldn't find a "From the publisher", only a couple of comments. And I don't like 2-sentence articles. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 16:43, 23 January 2008 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 21:43, 23 January 2008
Quote: It is, like its successor, neither scholarly nor very deep. Shouldn't we try to keep our articles as objective as possible? ~ Earendilyon 16:20, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Guilty as charged. I don't really like Noel. I couldn't find a "From the publisher", only a couple of comments. And I don't like 2-sentence articles. -- Ederchil 16:43, 23 January 2008 (EST)