Talk:The Mythology of Middle-earth: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary
 
(I confess)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Quote: ''It is, like its successor, neither scholarly nor very deep.'' Shouldn't we try to keep our articles as objective as possible? ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 16:20, 23 January 2008 (EST)
Quote: ''It is, like its successor, neither scholarly nor very deep.'' Shouldn't we try to keep our articles as objective as possible? ~ [[User:Earendilyon|Earendilyon]] 16:20, 23 January 2008 (EST)
:Guilty as charged. I don't really like Noel. I couldn't find a "From the publisher", only a couple of comments. And I don't like 2-sentence articles. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 16:43, 23 January 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 21:43, 23 January 2008

Quote: It is, like its successor, neither scholarly nor very deep. Shouldn't we try to keep our articles as objective as possible? ~ Earendilyon 16:20, 23 January 2008 (EST)

Guilty as charged. I don't really like Noel. I couldn't find a "From the publisher", only a couple of comments. And I don't like 2-sentence articles. -- Ederchil 16:43, 23 January 2008 (EST)