Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles/Archive: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
(History begins) |
(FA history xfer) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Aragorn II]]== | ==[[Witch-king of Angmar]]-- ''Successful Election''== | ||
This article was brought to my attention, and it turned out to be surprisingly strong. It has good segmentation, well-illustrated, good references, with a strong section on portrayals. It would make a very strong addition to our new '''FA''' collection.--[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 19:43, 4 June 2008 (EDT) | |||
* I whole-heartedly '''agree'''. This is a very long article which buckets of information and I think really shows us our ability to make long, detailed, accurate and engaging articles. --[[User:Mith|Mith]] 11:50, 24 June 2008 (EDT) | |||
* '''Agree'''. I go along with both of you and think that it would be a perfect "Featured Article" due to its richment of details, good illustration and good style. -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 05:19, 25 June 2008 (EDT) | |||
* '''Agree'''. I think more people should read it and as the "Featured Article" many would do it. loved to read it. -- [[User:Bombur Ironfoot|Bombur Ironfoot]] 15:04; 27 June 2008 (EDT) | |||
*'''Agree''', though about everything I want to say about it has been said already, I chose this one over Gandalf because as has been stated, that article has already been a featured article.--[[User:Quidon88|Quidon88]] 13:11, 11 July 2008 (EDT) | |||
* '''Agree'''. I do think that this article is very well made because it is very well constructed. Also, even though it is a plethora of information it is well ordered. Overall it is a wonderful choice for the featured article.--[[User:High King Fingolfin|High King Fingolfin]] 8:25, 12 July 2008 (EDT) | |||
==[[Aragorn II]]-- ''Successful Election''== | |||
This is a historic moment on the TG Wiki. It's my honor to nominate [[Aragorn II]] for featured status. We probably need to clearly state what the rules are for this procedure. I assume that it will be similar to other Wikis, with in place voting over some reasonable time period. Hyarion, help us out here. --[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 19:06, 12 May 2008 (EDT) | This is a historic moment on the TG Wiki. It's my honor to nominate [[Aragorn II]] for featured status. We probably need to clearly state what the rules are for this procedure. I assume that it will be similar to other Wikis, with in place voting over some reasonable time period. Hyarion, help us out here. --[[User:Theoden1|Theoden1]] 19:06, 12 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
* I '''agree''', this would make a great Featured Article, it has multiple images from multiple reputable artists, sound bytes, detailed history, both in the legendarium as well as portrayal in the film adaptations.--[[User:Quidon88|Quidon88]] 22:33, 12 May 2008 (EDT) | * I '''agree''', this would make a great Featured Article, it has multiple images from multiple reputable artists, sound bytes, detailed history, both in the legendarium as well as portrayal in the film adaptations.--[[User:Quidon88|Quidon88]] 22:33, 12 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:55, 12 July 2008
Witch-king of Angmar-- Successful Election
This article was brought to my attention, and it turned out to be surprisingly strong. It has good segmentation, well-illustrated, good references, with a strong section on portrayals. It would make a very strong addition to our new FA collection.--Theoden1 19:43, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
- I whole-heartedly agree. This is a very long article which buckets of information and I think really shows us our ability to make long, detailed, accurate and engaging articles. --Mith 11:50, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Agree. I go along with both of you and think that it would be a perfect "Featured Article" due to its richment of details, good illustration and good style. -- Eldarion Telcontar 05:19, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
- Agree. I think more people should read it and as the "Featured Article" many would do it. loved to read it. -- Bombur Ironfoot 15:04; 27 June 2008 (EDT)
- Agree, though about everything I want to say about it has been said already, I chose this one over Gandalf because as has been stated, that article has already been a featured article.--Quidon88 13:11, 11 July 2008 (EDT)
- Agree. I do think that this article is very well made because it is very well constructed. Also, even though it is a plethora of information it is well ordered. Overall it is a wonderful choice for the featured article.--High King Fingolfin 8:25, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
Aragorn II-- Successful Election
This is a historic moment on the TG Wiki. It's my honor to nominate Aragorn II for featured status. We probably need to clearly state what the rules are for this procedure. I assume that it will be similar to other Wikis, with in place voting over some reasonable time period. Hyarion, help us out here. --Theoden1 19:06, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
- I agree, this would make a great Featured Article, it has multiple images from multiple reputable artists, sound bytes, detailed history, both in the legendarium as well as portrayal in the film adaptations.--Quidon88 22:33, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
- I agree too. But "Personality" and "Portrayal in adaptations" need some work. I'll do Portrayal. -- Ederchil 03:27, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
- I agree. I don't see why not. -- Borondir 22:00, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
- I agree. I think it is a wonderful article and should be the featured article because it was made accurately and with much thought. Not only that but who better to have the featured article on than the King of Gondor and Arnor.--High King Fingolfin 7:14, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
- I agree. I'm still not sold on the quality of it, as it still needs a lot of improvement. However it is about time for a new FA and Aragorn II is certainly one of our better ones. --Hyarion 03:05, 1 June 2008 (EDT)
