Talk:Isengard: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 22 June 2011 by Mithrennaith
m (Agree with KA)
(agree)
Line 4: Line 4:


:::I agree, there needs to be a clear differentiation between the two concepts. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 14:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
:::I agree, there needs to be a clear differentiation between the two concepts. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 14:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
::::I agree with [[User:KingAragorn|KA]]. --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 15:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
::::I agree with [[User:KingAragorn|KA]]. --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 15:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


:::::+1 to KA. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 15:59, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
:::::+1 to KA. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 15:59, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
::::::+1 to KA as well. — [[User:Mithrennaith|Mithrennaith]] 02:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:04, 22 June 2011

I think Isengard and Orthanc should remain separate articles. -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  14:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I might have been too fast in adding the "merge" - but perhaps we could separate the two concepts more clearly? --Morgan 14:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree, there needs to be a clear differentiation between the two concepts. -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  14:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree with KA. --Amroth 15:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
+1 to KA. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 15:59, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
+1 to KA as well. — Mithrennaith 02:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]