Talk:Tom Bombadil/Nature

Sources

Is this article exempt from having sources, or do we just add individuals' theories to it? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 10:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

I don't think any theory can be referenced beyond Robert Foster or David Day. As long as a theory is objectively and properly explained, I think it would be fine to include it. (For example, the theory of Tom being Tolkien should remain out, as there is no clue about that in any text and cannot be explained beyond fandom ideas). What really concerns me is that both Tom articles include almost nothing of what Tolkien said about him. I include that in my to-do list. --LorenzoCB 19:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)