Tolkien Gateway

Talk:Quenta Silmarillion

Hm, since the chapter pages are empty, shouldn't we copyedit the bulk of the text to its respective chapter? Sage 13:30, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

And something else... shouldn't we fit somewhere the fictional history? Eg. compiled during the 4rth Age in Gondor or something like that...? Sage 13:32, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Move

We need to add an disambiguation here, since the chapter Quenta Silmarillion also appears in HoMe 5. Any ideas on how to name the two different chapters? "Quenta Silmarillion (The Silmarillion)", "Quenta Silmarillion (The Lost Road)"? A bit cumbersome... --Morgan 00:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

I vote for just leaving this here and only adding "(The Lost Road)" or "(The Lost Road chapter)" to the other. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 10:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
That might be wise, since there won't be as many internal links to the HoMe 5 chapter. There are also two chapters entitled The Later Quenta Silmarillion (HoMe 10 and 11)? Do you reckon there's any need to "disambig" these articles? I'm just thinking that there are quite many articles which would have "Silmarillion" in its title - a linguistic article, the chapters, the silmarils ("legendarium" article), perhaps an article about the manuscript, etc. --Morgan 10:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
I'd leave this here and call the other "Quenta Silmarillion (The Lost Road chapter)", myself, or even "Quenta Silmarillion (chapter)"! --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 23:50, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. But which is more appropriate? "Quenta Silmarillion (The Lost Road chapter)" or "Quenta Silmarillion (chapter)"? I don't think that "Quenta Silmarillion (The Lost Road chapter)" is necessary because The Silmarillion's "Quenta Silmarillion" is not actually a chapter and therefore disambiguation beyond "Quenta Silmarillion (chapter)" is not needed. -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  15:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)