Latest comment: 25 October 2010 by Mith
Want to chat about Tolkien in real-time?
Join our Discord server for discussions, collaboration, and a vibrant community!
I found a link to this article inside a "canonical" article (Swans). I'm tempted to add a non-canon template on the top of the page, but perhaps I shouldn't do it without some consultation. I remember we had a discussion about the non-canon template a while ago - what was the conclusion? As this article clearly takes its info from the BLT, we should mark it as non-canon, IMO. --Morgan 19:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- We didn't reach agreement, because we couldn't agree! --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 09:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)