Tolkien Gateway:Requests for adminship/Archive

From Tolkien Gateway
Shortcuts:
TG:RFA/A
TG:RFA/ARCHIVE
Archive.pngThis is an archive of past requests for adminship discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion, please do so on the current requests for adminship page.

Ederchil (8/5/08)[edit]

Two week deadline from first request

Support[edit]

  1. OK, Tolkien Gateway, the time has come. King Aragorn has made a good point about Hyarion's recent vacation, and I have always felt that there needed to be another admin on TG. If anything happened to Hy, TG would be crippled. I therefore nominate the first among the recent vacation triumvirate, Ederchil. He has shown himself worthy, an enforcer of TG standards, and a defender against outside disruptions. --Theoden1 21:40, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
  2. I agree, Hyarion is doing a great job, but if anything were to happen, I think Tolkien Gateway would be in good hands with Ederchil.--Quidon88 22:01, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
  3. I fully agree. --Þelma 04:49, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
  4. I certainly agree, for all reasons previously stated. Good luck!-- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  06:03, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
  5. If anyone can do it I personally agree that Ederchil is the person to do it.--User:High King Fingolfin/High King Fingolfin 23:10, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
  6. I agree, in the time I've been looking in here (and wanting to become much more active, but not finding the time for it), I have noticed Ederchil is always in evidence as keeping things in order somewhere. And must support my fellow countryman ;) -- Mithrennaith 22:01, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
  7. I agree, Ederchil has shown no signs of slowing down in activity and continues to contribute high quality content. Ederchil's opinions seem to always mirror my own and I see no reason why he wouldn't make a great administrator. Unsigned comment by Hyarion (talk • contribs). 21:02, 17 August 2008.

Oppose[edit]

Neutral/comments[edit]

Nominee's acceptance[edit]

Of course. -- Ederchil 02:33, 7 August 2008 (EDT)


Mith (28/06/10)[edit]

Two week deadline from first request (12/07/10).

Support[edit]

  1. I believe that this Wiki needs more sysops, and I believe Mith meets and exceeds all of the requirements listed above. As we discussed in the last meeting, adminship should not be seen as a promotion, rather a responsibility; I'm confident Mith will be able to meet the needs of this responsibility.-- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  21:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  2. Ditto. Agree. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 21:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  3. Agree. --Morgan 21:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  4. Agree. — Mithrennaith 22:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  5. I agree --Amroth 14:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
  6. Agree -- Eldarion Telcontar 19:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

Neutral/comments[edit]

Nominee's acceptance[edit]

  • Of course. And thank you to all those who have nominated me so far. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


LorenzoCB (11/12/21)[edit]

Two week deadline from first request: (25/12/21)

Support[edit]

  1. I would like to nominate LorenzoCB for adminship on TG. He meets all of the requirements listed above, and has consistently been helpful, considerate, and knowledgeable about the Wiki. Many of our admins have been unavailable recently, and I believe he is fully equipped for this responsibility. --Grace18 16:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
  2. Seconded, LorenzoCB deserves to be admin. --Turiannerevarine 03:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
  3. Seconded. --Tik 06:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
  4. Seconded. --Akhorahil 07:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
  5. I agree. --GondolinFan 13:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
  6. I agree. LorenzoCB has contributed to the content of articles, is knowledgeable about the wiki, and has been one of its most active users over the last year. --Oromë 15:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
  7. I agree. I was going to nominate him myself for reasons stated above before he said he'd be leaving temporarily, but as it does not appear that that will happen anytime in the near future I will gladly support his nomination. --Holdwine Meriadoc 03:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  8. I concur. JR Snow 09:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  9. I agree with promoting LorenzoCB to administrator. --Quirinius 13:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

Neutral/comments[edit]

Nominee's acceptance[edit]

Of course. I'll leave to the bureaucrats if I meet the first requiment. I'd wish to have changed my user name years ago, but this version of MediaWiki doesn't allow it. I can always make another account. --LorenzoCB 10:35, 13 December 2021 (UTC)